<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; advertising law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/advertising-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer protection, case XVII Ama 118/04</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/03/24/7730/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/03/24/7730/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2005/29/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Competition and Consumer Protection in its judgment of 23 February 2006 case file XVII Ama 118/04 published in the Official Journal of President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection of 2006/2 p. 37, held that respect for others is considered as the essence of the concept of good customs in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/03/24/7730/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case IPPB5/423-249/10-4/PS</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/03/5096/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/03/5096/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16(1) LEIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition of advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Legal Persons Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Chamber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish financial services company decided to increase sales of its services, by providing to clients and potential clients with different types of advertising materials bearing its logo. These materials are worth no more than 100 PLN each and are distributed to customers and potential customers during promotional events, sponsored events, as well as individual [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/03/5096/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I SA/Po 454/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/15/5145/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/15/5145/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definition of advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish company offers its partners and customers different products free of charge during its advertising actions. These are coffee and coffee machines or gadgets such as umbrellas, pens, mugs and other gifts such as shirts and other stuff with the logo of the company. The Company has considered whether this type of gratuitous transfer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/15/5145/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising law, case II OSK 1234/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/05/5105/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/05/5105/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 00:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An entrepreneur has placed a large billboard without obtaining a permit for the construction work. The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 29 July 2010 case file II OSK 1234/09 held that when dealing with an object, which must be built on a proper ground, this is a construction work that requires permits for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/05/5105/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising of pharmaceuticals, case VI SA/ Wa 1136/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/29/4799/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/29/4799/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 52 PHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 57 PHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-adverstising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical products advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Pharmaceutical Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of a story described in &#8220;Advertising of pharmaceuticals, case II GSK 461/09&#8220;. The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment case file VI SA/ Wa 1136/10 canceled the decision of the Main Pharmaceutical Inspector (MPI) that ordered the Polish Federation for Women and Family Planning (in Polish: Federacja na rzecz [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/29/4799/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

