<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; broadcasting law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/broadcasting-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Broadcasting law, case II GSK 741/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/13/4987/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/13/4987/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[broadcasting law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Broadcasting Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment case file II GSK 741/09 held that the Polish Act on Broadcasting – LOB – (in Polish: Ustawa o radiofonii i telewizji) of 29 December 1992, Journal of Law (Dziennik Ustaw) of 1993, No 7 item 34, consolidated text of 19 Novemver 2004, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/13/4987/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising of pharmaceuticals, case GIF-P-R-450/147-3/ZW/09/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/28/3666/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/28/3666/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 17(1) LOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 52 PHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Pharmaceutical Inspector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical products advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Pharmaceutical Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Main Pharmaceutical Inspector (MPI) questioned the legality of a few ads that were aired on different TV channels. See for instance the decision of the the Main Pharmaceutical Inspector of 4 March 2010, no. GIF-P-R-450/147-3/ZW/09/10, with regard to indication of a sponsor in &#8220;The producer of Guajazyl – cough syrup, invites to a forecast&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/28/3666/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising of pharmaceuticals, case VI SA/Wa 1758/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/06/1482/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/06/1482/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Pharmaceutical Inspector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical products advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Pharmaceutical Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish court issued a first judgment regarding TV/radio sponsored programmes and advertising of pharmaceutical products. US Pharmacia Company prepared a TV spot that was aired with a TV show. The following statement appeared in the spot. The programme is sponsored by the manufacturer of Apap Noc medicine. Apap Noc – now also available in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/06/1482/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case IV CSK 303/06</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2007/03/24/4718/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2007/03/24/4718/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 108 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in its judgment of 3 January 2007 case file IV CSK 303/06 ruled that the Copyright Commision should also resolve disputes relating to the conditions of agreement between a cable operator and the collecting society on the use of copyrighted works or performances. This conditions are inter alia the method of calculation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2007/03/24/4718/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfair competition, case III CZP 12/95</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/17/3777/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/17/3777/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unnamed delict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in a resolution of 25 February 1995, case file III CZP 12/95, held that the action of a broadcaster of TV or radio show can be considered an act of unfair competition if it meets the conditions laid down in article 3 of the Polish Act of 16 April 1993 on Combating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/17/3777/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

