<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; competition law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/competition-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer protection, case XVII Ama 118/04</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/03/24/7730/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/03/24/7730/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2005/29/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Competition and Consumer Protection in its judgment of 23 February 2006 case file XVII Ama 118/04 published in the Official Journal of President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection of 2006/2 p. 37, held that respect for others is considered as the essence of the concept of good customs in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/03/24/7730/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collective interests of consumers, case XVII Ama 125/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/11/26/1012/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/11/26/1012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A person who bought CHIO CHIPS produced by the Lorenz Bahlsen Snack-World, filed a complaint to the representation of the Office of Competition and Consumers Protection in Wrocław. This dissatisfied consumer argued that being in the store, he chose CHIO chips and not the other products that were sold in a similar price, because he [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/11/26/1012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case I ACa 16/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/08/852/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/08/852/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 89/104/EEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgments of Court of Justice of the EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation 40/94]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The French company Marin’s International brought a case before the Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs, located in Warsaw (in Polish: Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie Wydzial XXII Sąd Wspólnotowych Znaków Towarowych i Wzorów Przemysłowych). The issue concerned the use of CTMs Marin’s and Lama by the Polish company Display Flash Poland sp. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/08/852/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfair commercial practices, case DOK-6/2008</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/09/04/510/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/09/04/510/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Commercial Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In December 2005, the OCCP instituted antitrust proceedings against ZAiKS and the Polish Filmmakers Association (SFP), suspecting that &#8211; in order to maximise their profits &#8211; these organisations had made an agreement and fixed uniform charges for using audiovisual works and refused to negotiate their rates. Penalties for a total of more than $ 1.2 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/09/04/510/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polish regulations on unfair commercial practices</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2007/12/30/885/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2007/12/30/885/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparative advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2005/29/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Commercial Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Act of 23 August 2007 on Combating Unfair Commercial Practices &#8211; CUCP &#8211; (in Polish: ustawa o przeciwdziałaniu nieuczciwym praktykom rynkowym) published in Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 171, item 1206, came into force on 21 December 2007. It implemented the Directive 2005/29 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2007/12/30/885/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

