<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; contract law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/contract-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Civil law, case I ACa 295/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/27/4772/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/27/4772/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 70 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 70¹ CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allego.pl is a very popular Polish auction website. Michał Z. is one of many of its users. He was acting on behalf of his father’s company when he placed an auction. When setting the option &#8220;buy now&#8221;, he allegedly by mistake underpriced the item he was trying to sell. The item was valued for 74.000 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/27/4772/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abusive clauses in B2C IT contracts, case RWR 61-23/09/ZK</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/09/3599/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/09/3599/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 CUCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 CUCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Commercial Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The owners of hosting service available at pobieraczek.pl website advertised their business using slogans suggesting that the hosting and downloading of different files (mostly copyrighted material) is free. Advertising banners displayed &#8220;10 days to download for free&#8221; and &#8220;Yes, I want to test for 10 days&#8221;. However, users who wanted to host or to download [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/09/3599/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case I ACa 272/06</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 140 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Telecommunications Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Appellate Court in Katowice, in a judgment of 16 June 2006, case file I ACa 272/06, ruled that it is pointless to talk about the &#8220;ownership&#8221; of Internet domains, because the civil law sets the property rights in article 140 of the Civil Code, which only refers to tangibles, and domains are not such [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case X GC 1245/03</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/06/850/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/06/850/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The District Court in Łódź, X Commercial Division in its judgment of 22 June 2004, case file X GC 1245/03 decided the first Polish domain name case in Microsoft versus Robert Rudecki. The judgment was issued in absentia. The case concerned microsoft.pl and microsoft.com.pl domain names. See also &#8220;Polish case law on domain names&#8220;.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/06/850/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case I ACz 364/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/01/845/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/01/845/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 15 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Appellate Court in Białystok in its judgment of 6 May 2008, case file I ACz 364/08 ruled that, the registration and use of the Internet domain name which is the same as someone else already existing domain, may be regarded as an act of unfair competition. The definition is provided in the article 3(1) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/01/845/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

