<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law &#187; contract law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/contract-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Civil law, case I ACa 295/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/27/4772/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/27/4772/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 70 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appellate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allego.pl is a very popular Polish auction website. Michał Z. is one of many of its users. He was acting on behalf of his father’s company when he placed an auction. When setting the option &#8220;buy now&#8221;, he allegedly by mistake underpriced the item he was trying to sell. The item was valued for 74000 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/27/4772/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abusive clauses in B2C IT contracts, case RWR 61-23/09/ZK</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/09/3599/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/09/3599/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 CUCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 CUCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Commercial Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The owners of hosting service available at pobieraczek.pl website advertised their business using slogans suggesting that the hosting and downloading of different files (mostly copyrighted material) is free. Advertising banners displayed “10 days to download for free&#8221; and &#8220;Yes, I want to test for 10 days&#8221;. However, users who wanted to host or to download [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/09/3599/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case I ACa 272/06</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 140 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Telecommunications Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appellate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Appellate Court in Katowice, in a judgment of 16 June 2006, case file I ACa 272/06, ruled that it is pointless to talk about the &#8220;ownership&#8221; of Internet domains, because the civil law sets the property rights in article 140 of the Civil Code, which only refers to tangibles, and domains are not such [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case X GC 1245/03</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/06/850/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/06/850/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, as I wrote in my previous post &#8211; errare humanum est. My good friend Marcin Sochacki reminded me that there is an earlier judgment of the Polish court regarding the cybersquatting issue. It is a judgment of the District Court in Łódź, X Commercial Division of 22 June 2004, case file X GC 1245/03, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/06/850/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case I ACz 364/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/01/845/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/01/845/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 15 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I may be wrong (errare humanum est right?) but it looks like the Appellate Court in Białystok in its judgment of 6 May 2008, case act signature I ACz 364/08 decided the first Polish court&#8217;s case regarding the cybersquatting issue. The court simply ruled that, the registration and use of the Internet domain name which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/01/845/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
