<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; collecting society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/copyright-law/collecting-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case III CZP 61/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/19/7279/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/19/7279/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20(1) ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permissible use of copyrighted materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish Supreme Court in its order of 26 October 2011 case file III CZP 61/11 held that manufacturers and importers of photocopiers, scanners and other similar reprographic equipment, that allow for the production of copies of the whole or part of the published copyrighted work, are obliged to provide to the competent organization for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/19/7279/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case P 18/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/14/7071/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/14/7071/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20(1) ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 31 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Constitutional Tribunal of the Republic of Poland in its judgment of 11 October 2011 case file P 18/09 held that Collecting Societies acting on behalf of authors, performers, producers of phonograms and videograms and publishers, may demand from manufacturers of copiers and recorders all information and documents necessary for calculation of the amount of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/14/7071/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I FSK 1215/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7004/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 19 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 43 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 8 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 9 September 2011 case file I FSK 1215/10 ruled that activities of the Polish Artists&#8217; Association, a collecting society which is responsible for collective management of artists&#8217; and performers&#8217; rights that is based on signing of licensing agreements with copyright users and collecting and distribution of royalties, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case V CSK 373/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/05/6901/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/05/6901/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 21¹ ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permissible use of copyrighted materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in its judgment case file V CSK 373/10 held that a court cannot prohibit rebroadcasting of TV programs, if it was a part of the activity of a cable television, even if rebroadcasting was made without the consent of the collecting society. If the parties argue about rates for rebroadcasting, the court [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/05/6901/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case III CZP 1/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/24/4713/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/24/4713/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 108 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 21 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in its order of 13 July 2010 case file III CZP 1/10 held that operators of cable networks may initiate court&#8217;s proceedings with regard agreements on remuneration scales/tables concluded or to be concluded with the competent organization for collective management of copyright, that concerns rebroadcasting of copyrighted works on radio and television [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/24/4713/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

