<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; copyright misuse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/copyright-misuse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer protection, case VI ACa 1179/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/02/20/7809/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/02/20/7809/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 108 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection in its decision of 29 August 2008 case DOK &#8211; 6/2008 ruled that two Polish collecting societies, the Association of Writers and Composers (Stowarzyszenie Autorów &#8211; ZAiKS) and the Polish Filmmakers Association (Stowarzyszenie Filmowców Polskich &#8211; SFP), were involved in actions deemed as infringement of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/02/20/7809/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer protection, case XVII Amc 113/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/29/7779/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/29/7779/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 20¹ ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 385¹ CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The provision of the Rules of the Municipal Public Library in Słupsk stated that the Library may allow for reproductions or digital reproductions of one publishing volume sheet, which is approx. 22 pages of A4 format, of any documents protected by copyright law that are in the collection of the Library. However, such rules are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/29/7779/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access to public information, case V Ca 2388/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/09/6119/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/09/6119/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 222 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Regional Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor Janusz S. Bień requested the Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences to disclose public information on the license agreement, concerning the online version of the Dictionary of the Polish language of the sixteenth century. The request was filed under the Polish Act of 6 September 2001 on access to public [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/09/6119/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case II GSK 746/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/10/4917/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/10/4917/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 144 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 156 §1 pt 2 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 164 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 253(2) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generic sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of a story decribed in &#8220;Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 2284/08&#8221; that concerned the trade mark HERITAGE FILMS. The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 10 August 2010 case file II GSK 746/09 dismissed the cassation complaint brought by Zygmunt Piotrowski. The SAC held inter alia that the provisions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/10/4917/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 2284/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/04/20/4919/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/04/20/4919/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 144 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 164 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 253(2) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 8(1) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 8(2) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1990, Zygmunt Piotrowski who is a well-known Polish graphic artist, created the logotype that depicted the porch with columns and attic finial of the Penderecki&#8217;s house in Lusłwice with &#8220;heritage&#8221; inscription underneath. It was created for the Heritage Promotion of Music and Art company, whose founders were Elżbieta Penderecka and Janusz Pietkiewicz, later the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/04/20/4919/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

