<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; digital economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/digital-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Personal interest, case XXIV C 1035/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/14/7219/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/14/7219/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 22¹ CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 43¹ CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-adverstising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark dilution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8220;Nigdy Więcej&#8221; (Never Again) Association and the &#8220;Zielone Światło&#8221; (Green Light) Foundation organized a social action entitled &#8220;Nazism never again on Allegro&#8221;. It was a protest against a Polish auction website Allegro.pl which allowed to buy and sell different Nazi gadgets and memorabilia. The Foundation together with a writer, artist and social activist Jerzy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/14/7219/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labour law, case II PK 110/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/18/6488/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/18/6488/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 52 §1 pt 1 Labour Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Labour Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish Supreme Court in its judgement of 4 November 2010 case file II PK 110/10 held that single use of the company computer (laptop) for personal use during working hours and the occasional viewing of erotic files outside working hours is not a grave violation, which determines the disciplinary dismissal (termination of an employment [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/18/6488/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I SA/Wr 1080/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/27/6304/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/27/6304/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 86 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Wrocław in its judgment of 24 November 2010 case file I SA/Wr 1080/10 ruled that in case of advance payment of fees for the entire period of software maintenance the client can deduct all the VAT.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/27/6304/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer crime, case II K 127/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/10/21/5830/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/10/21/5830/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 287 § 1 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Criminal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Regional Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A young man was charged with the removal of computer data in the form of virtual objects belonging to a specific game avatar. He acted to the detriment of another person, without authorization, with an Internet account in the Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Game &#8211; Metin2. According to the indictment he obtained access (login, password) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/10/21/5830/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case III SA/Wa 1008/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/14/5862/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/14/5862/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Legal Persons Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish company conducts its business based mainly on providing IT services and sales of software and hardware. The Company enquired the Tax Office whether the fees paid by it to the contractors based in the U.S. and the Netherlands in connection with making available of software, are subject to the flat tax at source [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/14/5862/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

