<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; computer law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/e-law-issues/computer-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Access to public information, case XVI K 112/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/18/8153/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/18/8153/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 09:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Regional Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=8153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grzegorz Pluciński, the CEO of the Polish company Mainframe, filed a private accusation against Andrzej Machnacz who was the Director of the Centre of Information of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in 2008-2010. It is probably the first case based on the provisions of Article 23 of the Polish Act of 6 September [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/18/8153/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case III CSK 120/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/15/8125/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/15/8125/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 140 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 18 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=8125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MEDianus sp. z o.o. and Medianus Agencja Reklamowa sp. z o.o. are seated in the same city, at a location nearby. The first one uses medianus.net domain name and the second medianus.pl. The first company was entered in the Register of Business Entities in the National Court Register (KRS) as MEDianus in June 2003 r. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/15/8125/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access to public information, case I OSK 2265/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/11/8084/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/11/8084/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=8084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Polish company requested the Ministry of the Interior and Administration (MIA), and Director of the Centre of Information of MIA, to disclose all legal opinions prepared by the Polish Information Processing Society that concerned IT systems created by the Ministry. The Director provided all the requested documents, however the Ministry only asked the Company [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/11/8084/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-signature law, case II SAB/Łd 35/12</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/11/7889/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/11/7889/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 46 §1 pt 4 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 58 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Polish citizen filed a complaint to the Voivodeship Administrative Court via e-mail, and signed it with the qualified electronic signature. The Court called him to sign the complaint manually, within 7 days under pain of rejection of the complaint. The applicant argued that he already signed it. The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Łódź in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/11/7889/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal interest, case I CSK 111/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/03/25/7636/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/03/25/7636/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surname]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cezary Pazura sued Grupa o2, the owner and publisher of pudelek.pl website. Mr Pazura claimed that the company infringed his dignity, the inviolability of the home, privacy and publicity, by publishing 17 articles that concerned his relationship with Edyta Zajac, then fiancee, and now his wife. He argued that comments like &#8220;his mistress was no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/03/25/7636/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

