<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; domain names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/e-law-issues/domain-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case III CSK 120/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/15/8125/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/15/8125/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 140 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 18 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=8125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MEDianus sp. z o.o. and Medianus Agencja Reklamowa sp. z o.o. are seated in the same city, at a location nearby. The first one uses medianus.net domain name and the second medianus.pl. The first company was entered in the Register of Business Entities in the National Court Register (KRS) as MEDianus in June 2003 r. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/15/8125/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 1319/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/28/7296/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/28/7296/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §3 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(1)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 134 §1 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 151 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 245 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 77 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CC TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 89/104/EEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Designer drugs are well-known as &#8220;dopalacze&#8221; in Poland (in English: boosters). They were freely available on the Polish market because of the legal loophole in the Polish Act of 29 July 2005 on Counteracting Drug Addiction. In 2010, after different mainstream media reported on several cases involving health problems caused by such drugs, the Polish [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/28/7296/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 1291/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/23/7285/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/23/7285/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[absolute grounds for refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquired distinctiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 129(1)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 129(2)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 129(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 151 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[descriptive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish Patent Office refused to grant the right of protection for the word-figurative trade mark LAW24.pl applied for the Polish law firm Komarnicka Korpalski Kancelaria Prawna sp.j for services in Class 35 such as advising on business and business management consultancy, in Class 36 such as financial consultancy and financial and accounting activity, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/23/7285/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case I ACa 1087/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/02/6540/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/02/6540/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1206 CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 154 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(1) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 89/104/EEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation 40/94]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Conciliation for Internet Domains at the Polish Chamber of Information Technology and Telecommunications (the CCID) in its award of 9 March 2010 case file 74/09/PA dismissed the complaint brought by Italian company Bisazza against Polish entrepreneur Rafał Kacprzak Installation.pl from Wrocław who registered the following domain names: bisazza.pl, bisazza.com.pl and bisazza-installation.com. Bisazza [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/02/6540/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collective interests of consumers, case III SK 44/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/09/6643/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/09/6643/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 13:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consumer protection law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terms of Service of Domeny.pl website contained a clause that allowed Domeny.pl to introduce changes in TOS and it also included a statement that the changes take effect &#8220;from the time a new version is available on the website&#8221;. The President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection decided that this provision violates the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/09/6643/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

