<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; e-auctions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/e-law-issues/e-auctions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Personal interest, case XXIV C 1035/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/14/7219/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/14/7219/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 22¹ CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 43¹ CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-adverstising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark dilution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8220;Nigdy Więcej&#8221; (Never Again) Association and the &#8220;Zielone Światło&#8221; (Green Light) Foundation organized a social action entitled &#8220;Nazism never again on Allegro&#8221;. It was a protest against a Polish auction website Allegro.pl which allowed to buy and sell different Nazi gadgets and memorabilia. The Foundation together with a writer, artist and social activist Jerzy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/14/7219/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I SA/Łd 762/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7294/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7294/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 145 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 151 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Łódź in its judgment of 23 September 2010 case file I SA/Łd 762/10 held that a person whose account on an auction website was illegally hacked and used for sale of goods by someone else, is not obliged account to tax for such activity.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7294/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal data protection, case II SA/Wa 2037/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/12/6619/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/12/6619/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 15:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art 12(2) PPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 22 PPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 PPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 29 PPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspector General for Personal Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Protection of Personal Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish branch of McDonald&#8217;s Corp. has made a promotional campaign based on the issuance of the so-called &#8220;bonificards&#8221; i.e. discount cards entitling the holder to purchase certain McDonald&#8217;s products at a reduced price. Only employees and business partners were allowed to use such cards. The terms of the promotion explicitly stated that the cards [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/12/6619/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil law, case II Ca 26/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/09/6648/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/09/6648/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 15:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 70¹ CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Regional Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrzej J., a Polish farmer, ordered his 17-year-old son to put up for sale a tractor. He told him to use Allegro.pl, the most popular Polish auction website. It was one of the first auctions on the Internet for both of them. However, his son, who started the action, did not specify a minimum selling [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/09/6648/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil law, case I ACa 295/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/27/4772/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/27/4772/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 70 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 70¹ CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allego.pl is a very popular Polish auction website. Michał Z. is one of many of its users. He was acting on behalf of his father’s company when he placed an auction. When setting the option &#8220;buy now&#8221;, he allegedly by mistake underpriced the item he was trying to sell. The item was valued for 74.000 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/27/4772/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

