<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; e-court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/e-law-issues/e-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>E-signature law, case II SAB/Łd 35/12</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/11/7889/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/11/7889/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 46 §1 pt 4 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 58 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Polish citizen filed a complaint to the Voivodeship Administrative Court via e-mail, and signed it with the qualified electronic signature. The Court called him to sign the complaint manually, within 7 days under pain of rejection of the complaint. The applicant argued that he already signed it. The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Łódź in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/11/7889/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-proceedings, case II FZ 447/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/02/23/7562/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/02/23/7562/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 194 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 46 §1 pt 4 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 83 § 1 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Gdańsk in its order of 23 March 2011 case file I SA/Gd 916/10 rejected a complaint against a decision on leaving the applicant&#8217;s request for the relief for the payment of court fees from the complaints, without examination. The complaint was sent by post the day after the deadline, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/02/23/7562/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access to public information, case III SAB/ Lu 1/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/13/8117/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/13/8117/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 19:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=8117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Polish citizen requested the President of one of the Regional courts to disclose the calendar of causes that concerned his case. The President informed that the calendar of causes cannot be disclosed, because the regulation on the work of common courts does not permit for such disclosure after the calendar is deposited in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/05/13/8117/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-signature law, case II SA/Gd 573/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 46 §1 pt 4 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 63 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Gdańsk in its order of 9 September 2010 case file II SA/Gd 573/10 held that the legal effectiveness of a letter brought by a party to an administrative court by electronic means must be confirmed by its later signature. This is the requirement provided in Article 46 § 1 pkt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-proceedings in Poland</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/18/1671/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/18/1671/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[admonition proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Regional Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1 January 2010 the provisions of the Act of 9 January 2009, amending the Act &#8211; Civil Proceedings Code and other acts, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 26, item 156, came into force. This act introduced articles 50528 &#8211; 50537 which added to the CPC, in the First Book &#8211; the Trial, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/18/1671/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

