<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; e-court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/e-law-issues/e-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>E-signature law, case II SA/Gd 573/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 46 §1 pt 4 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 63 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Gdańsk in its order of 9 September 2010 case file II SA/Gd 573/10 held that the legal effectiveness of a letter brought by a party to an administrative court by electronic means must be confirmed by its later signature. This is the requirement provided in Article 46 § 1 pkt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-proceedings in Poland</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/18/1671/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/18/1671/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[admonition proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Regional Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1 January 2010 the provisions of the Act of 9 January 2009, amending the Act &#8211; Civil Proceedings Code and other acts, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 26, item 156, came into force. This act introduced articles 50528 &#8211; 50537 which added to the CPC, in the First Book &#8211; the Trial, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/18/1671/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-signature law, case I OPP 25/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/09/18/5380/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/09/18/5380/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 178 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 197 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 46 §1 pt 4 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Administrative Court in its order of 24 July 2007 case file I OPP 25/08 held that the letter that was brought by electronic means must be signed in person by a party or its representative to become legally effective, because only such signature meet the requirements under Article 46 § 1 pkt 4 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/09/18/5380/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

