<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; e-proceedings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/e-law-issues/e-proceedings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>E-signature law, case II SA/Gd 573/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 46 §1 pt 4 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 63 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Gdańsk in its order of 9 September 2010 case file II SA/Gd 573/10 held that the legal effectiveness of a letter brought by a party to an administrative court by electronic means must be confirmed by its later signature. This is the requirement provided in Article 46 § 1 pkt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case III SA/Wa 396/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/18/3868/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/18/3868/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-invoices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treaty on European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court (VAC) in Warsaw in a judgment of 8 April 2010, case file III SA/Wa 396/10, ruled that there is no legislative impediment to the existence of a mixed system for the storage of invoices, which consists of sending an invoice in paper and storage of its electronic copies with the option [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/18/3868/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-access to public information, case II SAB/Wa 86/07</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/20/2355/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/20/2355/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Electronic Signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 10 December 2007, case file II SAB/Wa 86/07, held that the request filed in the electronic form (e-mail) that was not signed with the qualified electronic signature is a legally sufficient request for disclosure of public information. Furthermore, the request for disclosure of public information [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/20/2355/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-access to public information, case II SAB/Sz 148/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/20/2351/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/20/2351/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 61 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court (VAC) in Szczecin, in a judgment of 16 December 2009, case file II SAB/Sz 148/09, held that the general principle set in article 61 of the Polish Constitution, is the access to information on the activities of public authorities. Any exceptions to this rule should be formulated explicitly, and all doubts [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/20/2351/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-access to public information, case II SAB/ Wa 57/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/18/2343/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/18/2343/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 5(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 63 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2008, the Polish media reported a story on the Polish Post which allegedly tested a system that scans envelopes and parcels. There were rumours that information gathered by such scanning could be used by the Internal Security Agency (ABW). ABW denied, but the Inspector General for Personal Data Protection has decided to investigate how [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/18/2343/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

