<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; e-signature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/e-law-issues/e-signature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>E-access to public information, case IV SA/Gl 1002/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/14/7081/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/14/7081/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §1 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 110 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 §1 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 58 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A journalists requested one of the Polish companies to disclose information about the earnings of its directors (CEOs) and members of the supervisory board. He also wanted to know how many prizes, bonuses and other financial inducements were received by the CEO and the board members in the last three years, and how much the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/14/7081/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I SA/Po 486/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/11/6478/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/11/6478/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Chamber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Poznań in its judgment of 22 October 2010 case file I SA/Po 486/10 held that a company that is obliged to send annual tax information about its employees is also allowed to send to him or her a tax declaration in the form of electronic message (e-mail) under the condition [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/11/6478/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-signature law, case II SA/Gd 573/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 46 §1 pt 4 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 63 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Gdańsk in its order of 9 September 2010 case file II SA/Gd 573/10 held that the legal effectiveness of a letter brought by a party to an administrative court by electronic means must be confirmed by its later signature. This is the requirement provided in Article 46 § 1 pkt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/11/5377/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case ITPP3/443-52/10/JK</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/05/4282/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/05/4282/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 106 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-invoices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Chamber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish newspaper Gazeta Prawna reports in the article entitled &#8220;Faktury papierowej nie można przechowywać w formie elektronicznej&#8221; on the individual interpretation of the Director of Tax Chamber in Bydgoszcz of 17 June 2010 No. ITPP3/443-52/10/JK regarding e-invoices. The Director explained that there is no possibility to store electronic invoices, which were issued and sent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/05/4282/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I FSK 1444/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/21/3886/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/21/3886/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 13:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 106 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-invoices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Chamber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish entrepreneur asked the Director of the Tax Chamber in Kraków, whether the inclusion in the billing of VAT of the amount of tax charged on the purchase of goods and services on the basis of invoices and correction invoices received by e-mail or fax, not in the form of electronic invoices with digital [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/21/3886/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

