<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; European Patent Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/european-patent-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case file VI SA/Wa 595/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/22/6152/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/22/6152/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 245 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 315 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 52 EPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 30 June 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 595/10 held that the terms &#8220;solution of a technical nature&#8221; or &#8220;technology&#8221; are not defined in the European Patent Convention. Thus, the development of these concepts depends on the practice of the EPO. There is no doubt that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/22/6152/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case II GSK 245/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/18/3440/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/18/3440/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 27 PCT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 52 EPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Cooperation Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in a judgment of 15 November 2009, case file VI SA/Wa 906/09 ruled that the scope of the European patent is the same as in the case of a national patent granted, and the case law of individual member states presents different approaches to the examination of the patentability of inventions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/18/3440/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case VI SA/Wa 1525/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/15/3767/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/15/3767/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 37 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On September 2008, the Polish Patent Office (PPO) refused to grant a patent for an invention entitled &#8220;method and device for access to the telecommunications network and for accounting telecommunications services&#8221;. The PPO held that this invention is not a technical solution. The applicant filed a complaint to the administrative court. The Voivodeship Administrative Court [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/15/3767/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case VI SA/Wa 2566/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/13/861/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/13/861/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 10 June 2009 case file VI SA/Wa 2566/08 held that it is up to the Polish Patent Office (PPO) to reconsider the matter in its entirety and refer to the statements and allegations contained in the request for the reconsideration of the case, taking into [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/13/861/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

