<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law &#187; European Patent Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/european-patent-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case VI SA/Wa 906/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/18/3440/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/18/3440/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 27 PCT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 52 EPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Cooperation Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in a judgment of 15 November 2009, case file VI SA/Wa 906/09 ruled that the scope of the European patent is the same as in the case of a national patent granted, and the case law of individual member states presents different approaches to the examination of the patentability of inventions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/18/3440/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case VI SA/Wa 1525/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/15/3767/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/15/3767/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 37 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On September 2008, the Polish Patent Office (PPO) refused to grant a patent for an invention entitled &#8220;method and device for access to the telecommunications network and for accounting telecommunications services&#8221;. The PPO held that this invention is not a technical solution. The applicant filed a complaint to the administrative court. The Voivodeship Administrative Court [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/15/3767/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case VI SA/Wa 2566/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/13/861/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/13/861/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[European Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial property law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court (VAC) in Warsaw in a judgment of 10 June 2009, case file VI SA/Wa 2566/08 held that it is up to the Polish Patent Office (PPO) to reconsider the matter in its entirety and refer to the statements and allegations contained in the request for the reconsideration of the case, taking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/13/861/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPO&#8217;s case law</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2007/06/17/203/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2007/06/17/203/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[European Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/2007/06/17/203/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fifth edition of the Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office has been published. Over a period of 27 years the EPO’s Boards of Appeal have settled more than 21 000 cases, while a total of 85 decisions and opinions issued by the Enlarged Board of Appeal have helped [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2007/06/17/203/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
