<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Directive 98/71/EC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/european-union-law/directive-9871ec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 538/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/09/6858/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/09/6858/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D trade mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §1 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 145 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 156 §1 pt 7 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 98/71/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark lapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of the story described in &#8220;Trade mark law, case Sp. 457/08&#8220;. Unilever filed a complaint against the decision of the Polish Patent Office in which the PPO decided on the lapse of the right or protection of 3D trade mark R-134678 because of its non-use in the form in which the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/09/6858/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design and trade mark law, case II GSK 481/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/14/4086/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/14/4086/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 117 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 98/71/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty of an industrial design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of the history described in &#8220;Industrial design and trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 710/08&#8220;. Rosinski Andrzej Rosinski Michal Rosinska Joanna Zaklad Produkcji Opakowan Rosinski i S-ka, Sp. J. decided to file a cassation complaint to the Supreme Administrative Court, hoping the Court would clarify the interpretation of article 117(2) of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/14/4086/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telecommunications law, case C‑99/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/02/4259/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/02/4259/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 30(2) Directive 2002/22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2002/22/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 98/71/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunication law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment of 1 July 2010, Case C‑99/09, Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa sp. z o.o. v. Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej, ruled that article 30(2) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users&#8217; rights relating to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/02/4259/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polish case law on industrial designs</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/12/1537/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/12/1537/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 98/71/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below, you will find a list of judgments on industrial designs that were decided upon in administrative proceedings. Finding cases that are decided upon in civil proceedings is more problematic becasue they are rarely available to general public. You can find a more detailed discussion on each judgment under the link provided with the case [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/12/1537/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design, case VI SA/Wa 498/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/18/1771/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/18/1771/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appearance of the whole or a part of a product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 98/71/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court (VAC) in Warsaw in a judgment of 10 June 2009, case file VI SA/Wa 498/09, ruled that the document based on the industrial property rights is assigned to more serious legal consequences than a document issued on a different legal basis. It was the result of the erga omnes protection of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/18/1771/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

