<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law &#187; Directive 98/71/EC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/european-union-law/directive-9871ec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design and trade mark law, case II GSK 481/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/14/4086/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/14/4086/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 117 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class46 post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 98/71/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty of an industrial design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of the history described in &#8220;Industrial design and trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 710/08&#8220;. The Polish company decided to file a cassation complaint to the Supreme Administrative Court, hoping the Court would clarify the interpretation of article 117(2) of the IPL. The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 15 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/14/4086/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telecommunication law, case C‑99/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/02/4259/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/02/4259/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 30(2) Directive 2002/22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2002/22/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 98/71/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunication law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment of 1 July 2010, Case C‑99/09, Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa sp. z o.o. v. Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej, ruled that article 30(2) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users&#8217; rights relating to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/02/4259/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polish case law on industrial designs</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/12/1537/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/12/1537/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Directive 98/71/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial property law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below, you will find a list of judgments on industrial designs that were decided upon in administrative proceedings. Finding cases that are decided upon in civil proceedings is more problematic becasue they are rarely available to general public. You can find a more detailed discussion on each judgment under the link provided with the case [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/01/12/1537/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design, case VI SA/Wa 498/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/18/1771/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/18/1771/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Directive 98/71/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appearance of the whole or a part of a product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court (VAC) in Warsaw in a judgment of 10 June 2009, case file VI SA/Wa 498/09, ruled that the document based on the industrial property rights is assigned to more serious legal consequences than a document issued on a different legal basis. It was the result of the erga omnes protection of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/18/1771/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
