<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law &#187; Regulation 40/94</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/european-union-law/regulation-4094/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Meta tags in Polish case law</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/08/852/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/08/852/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Directive 89/104/EEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgments of Court of Justice of the EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation 40/94]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secrets law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The French company Marin’s International brought a case before the Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs, located in Warsaw (in Polish: Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie Wydzial XXII Sąd Wspólnotowych Znaków Towarowych i Wzorów Przemysłowych). The issue concerned the use of CTMs Marin’s and Lama by the Polish company Display Flash Poland sp. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/08/852/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case I CSK 96/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/20/4403/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/20/4403/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class46 post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgments of Court of Justice of the EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appellate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation 40/94]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knock-offs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look-alikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavish imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[well known trade marks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the shade of the recent opinion of Advocate General Eleanor Sharpston QC given to the Court of Justice of the European Communities in case C‑529/07, Chocoladefabriken Lindt &#038; Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH, here is the story of couple of judgments decided in the recent suit brought against the Polish company Terravita by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/20/4403/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do not argue about copyrights and trade marks or you land in jail</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/14/733/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/14/733/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 00:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Directive 89/104/EEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgments of Court of Justice of the EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation 40/94]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeks 73 is a new initiative created and developed on the national level in Poland at the beginning of 2008 by the people of cultural professions. Our aim is to protect freedom of artistic expression and scientific researches guaranteed by the constitution (&#8230;) Freedom of artistic creation and scientific research, as well as free access [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/14/733/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Typosquatting and trade mark infringement</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/10/15/598/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/10/15/598/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Directive 2000/31/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 89/104/EEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgments of Court of Justice of the EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation 40/94]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is this case pending Vulcan Golf, LLC v. Google Inc. et al., No. 07 CV 3371 (N. Dist. Ill. June 15, 2007). You&#8217;ll have all necessary documents available at justia.com website. Ben Edelman from Harvard University made the whole case much more worse to argue for Google. Edelman and other lawyers have filed a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/10/15/598/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
