<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; appearance of the whole or a part of a product</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/industrial-designs/appearance-of-the-whole-or-a-part-of-a-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case II GSK 932/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/10/6363/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/10/6363/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appearance of the whole or a part of a product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103(3)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 108 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 117 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual character of a design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 19 October 2010 case file II GSK 932/09 held that an industrial design concerns the form of a product, i.e. external characteristics that are observable, and individual appearances of a product cannot be claimed only because the material which was used to achieve the final effect (that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/10/6363/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 1339/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/12/06/6245/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/12/06/6245/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appearance of the whole or a part of a product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement of registered industrial design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 3 October 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 1339/10 held that the &#8220;identicality&#8221; as understood in the definition of a novelty of an industrial design is not consistent with the meaning of the word &#8220;identical&#8221;, which means that the compared designs should be the same. Identical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/12/06/6245/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 599/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/02/4840/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/02/4840/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appearance of the whole or a part of a product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §3 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 246 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty of an industrial design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 12 May 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 599/10 held that the factual justification of the decision of the Polish Patent Office should contain the facts that the PPO regards as proven, the evidence relied upon and the reasons for which other evidence has been treated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/02/4840/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 598/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/02/4837/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/02/4837/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appearance of the whole or a part of a product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §3 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 255 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 12 May 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 598/10 held that the court’s review of a decision issued by the PPO does not include a requirement to make additional findings for a case. The factual justification of the decision should contain the facts that the PPO [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/02/4837/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design, case VI SA/Wa 34/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/28/3687/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/28/3687/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appearance of the whole or a part of a product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty of an industrial design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court (VAC) in Warsaw in a judgment of 26 February 2010, case file VI SA/Wa 34/09, ruled that there is no doubt that the industrial design must be assessed in such a form in which it will be possible to visually acquaint with it and with all the features of a product. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/28/3687/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

