<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; informed user</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/industrial-designs/informed-user/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 922/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/19/6422/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/19/6422/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informed user]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 13 September 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 922/10 ruled on three important factors of the design law. The VAC held that the &#8220;overall impression&#8221; refers to the design as a whole, and not to its individual characteristics. It is therefore a general effect, the general [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/19/6422/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 921/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/12/06/6240/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/12/06/6240/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informed user]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 13 September 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 921/10 ruled on three important factors of the design law. The VAC held that the &#8220;overall impression&#8221; refers to the design as a whole, and not to its individual characteristics. It is therefore a general effect, the general [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/12/06/6240/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 852/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/23/6161/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/23/6161/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 117 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual character of a design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informed user]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 20 September 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 852/10 held that an industrial design has individual character if the overall impression it produces on the informed user differs from the overall impression caused by the design that was publicly available before the date according to which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/23/6161/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 505/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/18/6139/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/18/6139/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §3 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 26 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 77 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informed user]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty of an industrial design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 23 June 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 505/10 held that as the informed user should be considered a person who orders from the manufacturer a set of advertising pads to promote his or her own business and to distribute such pads to places of their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/18/6139/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design case, VI SA/Wa 1727/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/20/5415/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/20/5415/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103(3)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informed user]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty of an industrial design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of a story described in &#8220;Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 1215/07&#8220;. The Polish Patent Office invalidated the right in registration based on the guidelines outlined in the mentioned judgements. The Polish company Gerlach S.A. filed a complaint. The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 14 December 2009 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/20/5415/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

