Archive for: industrial designs

Industrial design, case II GSK 612/08

January 28th, 2009, Tomasz Rychlicki

The Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) in a judgment of 27 January 2009, case file II GSK 612/08, held that it cannot deny the legitimacy to submit, in the opposition proceedings before the Polish Patent Office, a request for invalidation of a right in industrial design registration, to a person, who was charged with the allegation of committing the offense of assigning to itself the authorship of this exclusive right (plagiarism), if that person alleges and argues that the questioned right was granted in violation and against of legally binding regulations.

This judgment concerned the industrial design “Rozetka pod pieczęć i plastyczną oprawę dokumentów” (in English: Rosette under seal and plastic binding documents), Rp-632.

See also “Polish case law on industrial designs“.

Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 1827/08

December 12th, 2008, Tomasz Rychlicki

The Voivodeship Administrative Court (VAC) in Warsaw in a judgment of 11 December 2008, case file VI SA/Wa 1827/08, ruled that the protection of an industrial design may only apply to the appearance of an object – its external appearance, not to its internal structure. The cassation compliant bought before the Supreme Administrative Court was rejected in a decision of 16 December 2009, case file II GSK 238/09.

Wzór Przemysłowy Rp-9201

This judgment concerned the industrial design “Zadaszenie drzwi” (in English: door canopy), Rp-9201. See also “Polish regulations on industrial designs” and “Polish case law on industrial designs“.

Industrial design and trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 710/08

November 25th, 2008, Tomasz Rychlicki

On 10 April 2001 the Polish company Rosinski Andrzej Rosinski Michal Rosinska Joanna Zaklad Produkcji Opakowan Rosinski i S-ka, Sp. J (this is the actual company name – the firm, which consist of names of partnes “Rosinski Andrzej Rosinski Michal Rosinska Joanna”, the name “packages production plant” and the type of legal entity they operate “general/partnership company”) applied for design registration for bottle with top. On 14 January 2003, the Polish Patent Office has registered the design, Rp-2543.

Rp-2543

In 2006, Unilever NV of Holland asked the PPO to annul its decision regarding Rp-2543. Unilever based its claims on provisions of article 117(2) of the Polish Act of 30 June 2000 on Industrial Property Law – IPL – (in Polish: ustawa Prawo własności przemysłowej) of 30 June 2000, published in Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) of 2001 No. 49, item 508, consolidated text on 13 June 2003, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 119, item 1117, with later amendments.

A finding that the exploitation of the industrial design infringes third parties’ personal or author’s economic rights will also constitute a ground for invalidation of the right in registration.

Unilever’s legitimate interest to request the invalidation was based the earlier 3D trade mark registration, R-134678, which was granted by the PPO in a decision of 28 January 1999. However, the problem with applying article 117(2) lays in the rules of Polish administrative procedure. The PPO is not allowed to decide if third parties rights are infringed.

R-134678

The PPO in its decision of 19 October 2007, act signature Sp. 187/06 invalidated the contested design. The Office recognized the similarity between the trade mark and the design based on arguments presented by Unilever’s patent attorney. The Polish company appealed. Its representative called into question the correctness of PPO’s decision in applying provisions of article 117(2). In his opinion the infringement issue should be decided by the civil court, not the administrative body which the Polish Patent Office is. However, the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in a judgment in a judgment of 21 November 2008, case file VI SA/Wa 710/08, did not agree with the Polish company arguments. In court’s opinion the PPO has been given the opportunity to assess similarities between a registered trade mark and a design. PPO’s conclusions that there exist a significant similarity may entitle the Office to decide with regard to the infringement of third parties rights.

This judgment is not yet final. A cassation complaint was filed to the Supreme Administrative Court. It will clarify the interpretation of article 117(2) of the IPL. See “Industrial design and trade mark law, case II GSK 481/09“.

See also “Polish regulations on industrial designs” and “Polish case law on industrial designs“.

Industrial design, case VI SA/Wa 1054/08

November 10th, 2008, Tomasz Rychlicki

The Voivodeship Administrative Court (VAC) in Warsaw in a judgment of 4 November 2008, case file VI SA/Wa 1054/08, ruled that the requirement for the issuance of a preliminary decision by other authority or a court, is one of the conditions for stay of the administrative proceedings pursuant to article 97 § 1 point 4 of the Polish Administrative Proceedings Code – APC – (in Polish: Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego) of 14 June 1960, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 30, item 168, consolidated text of 9 October 2000, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 98, item 1071 with subsequent amendments, but while looking for the justification that there exists the preliminary issue in a given case, one has to establish a causal connection between the settlement of the case and the preliminary issue. The lack of such connection makes the stay of proceedings under article 97 § 1 point 4 of the APC unacceptable. The issue of the infringement of the exclusive right referred to in article. 284(6) of the IPL, and civil claims relating thereto are decided by a civil court under civil procedure and the question wheather the use of industrial design that violates personal rights or property of third parties within the meaning of article 117(2) of the IPL, which come with the Polish Patent Office duties (the condition for invalidation of the rights in registration) are separate issues. Therefore, there is no reason to assume that the preliminary issue occurs in this case because the civil court is a proper one to settle the matter of the infringement of an exclusive right.

This case concerned the industrial design “Butelka cylindryczna” (in English: cylindrical bottle), Rp-5873.

Wzór Przemysłowy 5873

See also “Polish regulations on industrial designs” and “Polish case law on industrial designs“.

Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 1088/08

August 12th, 2008, Tomasz Rychlicki

The Voivodeship Administrative Court (VAC) in Warsaw in a judgment of 11 August 2008, case file VI SA/Wa 1088/08, ruled that it is not enough to prove that the design applied for differs from opposed designs, but it must also be proved that it does not contain the characteristics of these designs – further – that it is not in fact the sum of the characteristics of these designs, it is not a combination of opposed designs.

This judgment concerned the industrial design “Wiadro” (in English: bucket), PRZ-1077.

See also “Polish regulations on industrial designs” and “Polish case law on industrial designs“.

Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 543/08

June 28th, 2008, Tomasz Rychlicki

The Voivodeship Administrative Court (VAC) in Warsaw in a judgment of 10 June 2008, case file VI SA/Wa 543/08, wrongly named the design rights calling it “the right of protection” but the proper legal terminology is “the right in registration” according to article 105 of the Polish Act of 30 June 2000 on Industrial Property Law – IPL – (in Polish: ustawa Prawo własności przemysłowej) of 30 June 2000, published in Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) of 2001 No 49, item 508, consolidated text on 13 June 2003, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 119, item 1117, with later amendments.

Article 105
1. For an industrial design a right in registration may be granted.

2. The right in registration shall confer the exclusive right to exploit the industrial design for profit or for professional purposes throughout the territory of the Republic of Poland.

3. The holder shall enjoy the right to prevent any third party from making, offering, putting on the market, importing, exporting or using a product in which the design is incorporated or to which it is applied, or stocking such a product for those purposes.

4. The right conferred by the registration of an industrial design shall include any design which does not produce on the informed user a different overall impression. Article 104(2) shall apply accordingly.

5. The right conferred by the registration of an industrial design shall be limited to the kind of products, in respect of which the protection has been applied for.

6. Subject to Article 111, the term of a right in registration shall be 25 years counted from the date of filing of an industrial design application with the Patent Office, the said term being divided into 5-year periods.

See also “Polish regulations on industrial designs” and “Polish case law on industrial designs“.

Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 1215/07

January 2nd, 2008, Tomasz Rychlicki

The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 11 October 2007, case file VI SA/Wa 1215/07 decided on the novelty of an industrial design based on electronic evidences. The court ruled that such evidences are not sufficient. A CD print-out from a database can not be treated as a legal document with an unquestionable date since there are graphical tools which make a modification of such data an easily possibility. In this case such a proof can not be deemed a proper evidence if it is not properly certified. Also a statement issued by a private company is not enough unless it is supported by invoices or official publications of catalogues of exhibitions where such product was shown. A compact disk has to be certified by an expert as regards to a date it was burned.

This case concerned the industrial design “Rękojeść sztućców” (in English: handle for cutlery), Rp-6048.

Rp-6048

The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 29 July 2008 case file II GSK 267/08 upheld this decision.

See also “Polish regulations on industrial designs” and “Polish case law on industrial designs“.

Industrial design, case II GSK 277/06

March 28th, 2007, Tomasz Rychlicki

The Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) in a judgment of 20 March 2007, case file II GSK 277/06, published in the electronic database LEX, under the no 321283, ruled on the definition of the appearance of the product.

It refers to the appearance given by certain characteristics or patterns perceived visually and thus causing certain general impression while watching the product of which the design has been applied or is included, in the form in which it occurs in the market during the presentation and the acquisition of goods. Elements of the goods that are not visible or because of its characteristics may not be visible without a significant change in the form of a product during its examination on the market, are not relevant for assessing novelty and individual character of the industrial design, and thus cannot be protected.

This case concerned the industrial design “Lód ekstrudowany jednosmakowy z nadzieniem” (In English: ice cream extruded with single taste stuffing), Rp-7461.

Wzór Przemysłowy 7461

See also “Polish regulations on industrial designs” and “Polish case law on industrial designs“.

Polish regulations on industrial designs

March 17th, 2005, Tomasz Rychlicki

I. The law
The main sources of binding laws in the Republic of Poland are the Constitution of 2 April 1997, acts passed by the Parliament, ratified international treaties and regulations issued, for example, by the Prime Minister or the Council of Ministers – Polish government. Regulations are issued for the purpose of implementation of acts. The main legal acts on industrial designs protection in the Republic of Poland are the following.

I.A. Substantive law

  • Act of 30 June 2000 on Industrial Property Law – IPL – (in Polish: ustawa Prawo własności przemysłowej) of 30 June 2000, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) of 2001 No 49, item 508, consolidated text of 13 June 2003, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 119, item 1117, with later amendments.
  • Act of 16 April 1993 on Combating Unfair Competition – CUC – (in Polish: ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji), Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 47, item 211, with later amendments.

I.B. Procedural law

  • Administrative Proceedings Code – APC – (in Polish: Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego) of 14 June 1960, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 30, item 168, consolidated text of 9 October 2000, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 98, item 1071 with subsequent amendments.
  • Act on proceedings before administrative courts – PBAC – (in Polish:Prawo o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi) of 30 August 2002, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 153, item 1270, with later amendments.
  • Civil Proceedings Code – CPC (in Polish: Kodeks Postępowania Cywilnego) of 17 November 1964, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 43, item 296, with later amendments.
  • Act on Patent Attorneys – APAT – (in Polish: ustawa o rzecznikach patentowych) of 11 April 2001, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 49, item 509, with subsequent amendments.

I.C. Case law
See “Polish case law on industrial designs“.

II. Definition of an industrial design
A product that is new and has individual character, appearance of the whole or a part of a product resulting from the features of, in particular, the lines, contours, colours, shape, texture or materials of a product or of its ornamentation may constitute an industrial design. As “product” is considered, in this context, any industrial or handicraft object, among others including packaging, get-up, graphic symbols and typographic characters, but excluding computer programs. Also considered as “product” are furthermore: (i) a product composed of multiple components which can be replaced allowing disassembly and re-assembly of the product (“complex product”); (ii) a part of a complex product if, once it has been incorporated into the complex product, it remains visible during normal use of that product (whereby maintenance, servicing or repair work are not considered “normal use”); and (iii) a part of a component product as such if it may by itself be subject of commercialization. Design protection cannot be obtained for: (i) features of a product which are exclusively dictated by the technical function of the product concerned; and (ii) features of a product which must necessarily be reproduced in their exact form and dimensions in order to allow the product in which the design is incorporated or to which it is applied to be mechanically connected to or to interact with another product. However, an industrial design which serves the purpose of allowing the multiple assembly or connection of mutually interchangeable products within a modular system may be protected. Design protection cannot be obtained for products constituting a component part of another complex product, usable for repair of that complex product in a way enabling recovery of its original appearance. Third parties may use the said component part in the meaning of its production, offering, introducing to the market, import, export or the use of a product comprising the said component part.

III. Applicant
The creator of the design or any assignee of the same. Foreigners may apply for and obtain registration to the same extent as nationals of Poland provided that reciprocity exists. Applicants residing abroad must be represented by an admitted patent attorney permanently residing in Poland.

IV. Procedure for Registration
Applications for the registration of a design are examined as to compliance with the formal requirements, and as to whether the design belongs to any of the categories mentioned above under “Not registrable. There is no examination as to novelty. If no objections are found a decision on grant of registration will be made, and applicant will be invited to pay within three months the fee for the first protection period of five years from grant and the publication fee; if the fees are not timely paid the decision on the grant will be revoked. After registration particulars thereof are published in the Patent Office Journal. The registration will be recorded in the Industrial Designs Register. A certificate of registration, of which the design specification, that is, the description of the design and the drawing(s) and (where applicable) the photographs or the textile samples form an integral part, will be issued. During the period until registration the Office will give information on the application only with the consent of applicant. During the procedure amendments that would alter the design and the forms of the design as presented in the description, drawings and photographs are not allowed; however, if the claimed form of a product is modified a corresponding amendment might be acceptable if the identity of the product is retained and the amendment is necessary for the grant of the registration.

IV.1. Requirements for Registration
An application may comprise up to ten forms of a design for which the essential features are common, except if the various forms together constitute a complete set of products, in which case the limitation to ten forms does not apply. All the forms of the industrial design contained in one application shall be presented in a form of figures on one of the illustrations (drawings or photographs);

The required documents are:
- request, comprising the full name and domicile of the applicant(s) and full names of the creator(s), and an indication of the article to which the design is to be applied; if applicable, comprising claim to priority,
- Power of attorney, not legalized,
- description of the main features of the design, in Polish language, in triplicate. (Claims and an abstract are not required for an industrial design application),
- Drawings, three sets, sizes of A4. An industrial design application shall contain illustrations, in particular drawings or photographs. An industrial design application may also contain samples of a textile fabric. The drawings must be made on sheets of white, flexible paper in solid lines, and must be made in such manner that all details can still be clearly distinguished after reduction in size to one third. At any rate a drawing or photographs presenting a perspective view must be filed. Additionally, drawings may be filed of other views, and also photographs of min. size 5 cm X 5 cm, max. size 13 cm X 18 cm (coloured photographs allowed). In the case of an application relating to more than one form of the design all of them should be presented on common illustration in perspective view, and additional illustrations may be filed for each form;
Priority claim priority must be claimed on filing, giving date, country and number of the application whose priority is claimed. A priority document, i.e. a certified copy of the application whose priority is claimed, must be filed (may be filed within three months from the filing date). If the priority document is not in English, French, German or Russian, a certified translation thereof must accompany the document.

IV.2. Registrable designs
Two dimensional, three dimensional, single deposits, multiple deposits

IV.3. Not registrable designs
- Designs not complying with the definition of a design;
- Designs lacking the required novelty or individual character;
- Designs, the exploitation of which would be contrary to public order or morality, provided that exploitation of a design shall not be deemed to be contrary to public order only because it is prohibited by law;
- Designs including the name or abbreviated name of the Republic of Poland or its symbols, the names or armorial bearings of Polish voivodships, towns or communities, the insignia of the armed forces, paramilitary organizations or police forces, reproductions of Polish decorations, honorary distinctions or medals, military medals or insignia, or other official or generally used distinctions and medals, in particular those of the government administration, local self-administration or social organizations performing activities in vital public interests, if the activities of these organizations extend to the entire territory or a substantial part of the territory of the State, unless applicant can furnish evidence (such as an authorization from a competent State agency or a permission given by an organization) of his right to use the sign concerned in the course of trade;
- Designs incorporating the abbreviated names, armorial bearings, flags or emblems of other countries or international organizations, or official signs or hallmarks indicating control and warranty adopted in other countries, if the prohibition to register these follows from international agreements, except if applicant can produce an authorization from a competent authority allowing him to use the sign concerned in the course of trade.
- Designs incorporating officially recognized signs accepted for use in trade, such as safety marks, quality marks, hallmarks etc., in so far this could mislead the public with regard to the nature of those signs, unless applicant can prove his right to use these.
- Designs incorporating elements which are symbols of a religious, patriotic or cultural nature, in so far as this could hurt religious feelings, sense of patriotism or national tradition.

IV.3. The novelty requirement
An industrial design must be new and have an individual character. A design will be considered to be new if, before the date of filing the application for its registration or, if priority is claimed, before the priority date, no identical design has been made available to the public anywhere in the world by use, exhibition or any other means. In this context it must be noted that designs are still considered identical if their characteristics differ only in immaterial details. A design will not be deemed made available to the public if before the filing or priority date it could not have become known to the circles specialized in the sector to which the design belongs.

A design will be considered to have individual character if the overall visual impression that it produces on the informed user differs from that produced by any design made available to the public before the date of filing the application for registration or, if priority is claimed, before the priority date. For the assessment of the individual character, the degree of freedom of the creator in developing the design is to be taken into consideration.

The novelty and individual character of a design incorporated in or applied to a product which is a component part of a complex product will only be assessed in consideration of its visible features. (As “complex product” is considered, a product composed of multiple components which can be replaced allowing disassembly and re-assembly of the product).

Not a bar to novelty are (i) disclosure of the design to a third party under explicit or implicit conditions of confidentiality;(ii) disclosure of the design during the 12 months preceding the filing date or, if priority is claimed, during the 12 months preceding the priority date by the creator or his successor in title, or by a third party with the consent of the creator or his successor in title; (iii) disclosure of the design during the 12 months preceding the filing date or, if priority is claimed, during the 12 months preceding the priority date as a consequence of an abuse in relation to the creator or his successor in title.

IV.4. Publication
Industrial design are kept secret prior to registration. Description of a registered design is available to the public in the Polish Patent Office.

V. Copyright Protection
A product according to a registered industrial design and put on the market after the lapse of the registration of the design shall not benefit from the the material copyrights under the provisions of the Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights – ARNR – (in Polish: ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych) of 4 February 1994, published in Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 24, item 83, consolidated text of 16 May 2006, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 90, item 631, with later amendments.

VI. Duration of the rights in registration for industrial designs
25 years from the date of filing of the application, which period is divided into five five-year periods.