<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; patent law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/patent-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Procedural law, case VI SAB/Wa 236/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/03/27/7751/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/03/27/7751/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 255 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 2009, FAKRO PP sp. z o.o. requested the Polish Patent Office to invalidate the European patent No. PL/EP 1706557 &#8220;window and insulating frame kit&#8221; that was granted under the European Patent Convention on the territory of the Republic of Poland. On December 2010, the company filed a complaint to the Voivodeship Administrative Court [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/03/27/7751/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case file II GSK 85/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/22/6152/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/22/6152/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 245 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 315 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 52 EPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 30 June 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 595/10 held that the terms &#8220;solution of a technical nature&#8221; or &#8220;technology&#8221; are not defined in the European Patent Convention. Thus, the development of these concepts depends on the practice of the EPO. There is no doubt that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/22/6152/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case VI SA/Wa 327/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/27/4776/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/27/4776/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 20:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Act on the Polish language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 245 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 26 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 33 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative court in its judgment of 28 April 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 327/10 held that the Polish Patent Office should provide translation into Polish of documents that were allowed as evidence in administrative proceedings. Such conclusions stem from the Act of 7 October 1999 on the Polish language published in Journal of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/27/4776/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case VI SA/Wa 112/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/22/4704/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/22/4704/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 20:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 28 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 19 March 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 112/10 held that adding to the patent application an idependent patent claim, that has a general feature that &#8220;electronic file is made available to anyone via the Internet&#8221;, which was made with the application for reconsideration, does not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/22/4704/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case II GSK 245/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/18/3440/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/18/3440/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 27 PCT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 52 EPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Cooperation Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in a judgment of 15 November 2009, case file VI SA/Wa 906/09 ruled that the scope of the European patent is the same as in the case of a national patent granted, and the case law of individual member states presents different approaches to the examination of the patentability of inventions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/18/3440/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

