<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law &#187; personal rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/personal-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Personal rights, case I ACa 1402/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/16/4615/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/16/4615/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appellate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotation right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Appellate Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 15 July 2010 case file I ACa 1402/09 held that even if a website only republishes articles or summaries of works published in major periodicals, it is not absolved from responsibility for infrigement of personal right/interests of a person who was described in such an article.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/16/4615/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design and trade mark law, case II GSK 481/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/14/4086/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/14/4086/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 117 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class46 post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 98/71/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty of an industrial design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of the history described in &#8220;Industrial design and trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 710/08&#8220;. The Polish company decided to file a cassation complaint to the Supreme Administrative Court, hoping the Court would clarify the interpretation of article 117(2) of the IPL. The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 15 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/14/4086/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal rights, case VI Aca 1460/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/12/4373/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/12/4373/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class46 post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appellate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Małgorzata F. sued a residential community and the advertising company for infringement of her personal rights that according to Małgorzata F. occured by placing on the building in which she lives a big banner advertising, which concealed all windows of her apartment. The plaintiff did not ask for financial compensation but only for the apology [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/12/4373/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains and trade mark law, case I ACa 1334/07</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/17/4091/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/17/4091/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 15(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 153 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 156 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appellate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The District Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 29 August 2007, case file XVI GC 756/06 dismissed the complaint filed by &#8220;Euro–net&#8221; sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the Court of Conciliation for Internet Domains at the Polish Chamber of Information Technology and Telecommunications of 23 March 2006, case file 22/05/PA PDF file, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/17/4091/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal rights, case I A CZ 296/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/05/3931/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/05/3931/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 16:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 PSEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2000/31/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Providing Services by Electronic Means]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appellate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 18 January 2010, Michał Okonek, the owner of MAP1 company, filed a petition to the court with a request to order ParaRent.com Wawrzyniak Sp. j. company seated in Szczecin, to block access to the thread entitled &#8220;a suit for the use of a part of a map&#8221; which is available at www.forumprawne.org website (http://forumprawne.org/prawo-autorskie/501-pozew-za-wykorzystanie-fragmentu-mapy.html) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/05/3931/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
