<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Polish Appeallate Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-courts/polish-appeallate-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Personal interest, case XXIV C 1035/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2013/03/14/7219/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2013/03/14/7219/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 22¹ CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 43¹ CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company name or firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-adverstising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark dilution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8220;Nigdy Więcej&#8221; (Never Again) Association and the &#8220;Zielone Światło&#8221; (Green Light) Foundation organized a social action entitled &#8220;Nazism never again on Allegro&#8221;. It was a protest against a Polish auction website Allegro.pl which allowed to buy and sell different Nazi gadgets and memorabilia. The Foundation together with a writer, artist and social activist Jerzy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2013/03/14/7219/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case I ACz 1156/12</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/12/31/9412/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/12/31/9412/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=9412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish entrepreneur Przedszkola Pomarańczowa Ciuchcia A. Sławek sp. jawna from Warszawa, the owner of the word-figurative trade mark pomarańczowa ciuchcia przedszkola R-247390 (orange choo-choo kindergartens), sued another entrepreneur seated in Mińsk Mazowiecki who runs kindergarten as its business activity under the name &#8220;Wesoła ciuchacia&#8221; (Jolly choo-choo). The District Court in Siedlce did not grant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/12/31/9412/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case I ACa 129/12</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/12/21/9429/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/12/21/9429/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 79 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permissible use of copyrighted materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=9429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish Collecting Society representing authors and composers sued an owner of a road restaurant that for nearly five years he played without a proper license agreement music from the television ads that were aired in news channels. The defendant claimed that he only uses the television as any citizen who pays subscription. The District [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/12/21/9429/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfair commercial practices, case VI ACa 1179/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/02/20/7809/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/02/20/7809/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 108 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection in its decision of 29 August 2008 case DOK &#8211; 6/2008 ruled that two Polish collecting societies, the Association of Writers and Composers (Stowarzyszenie Autorów &#8211; ZAiKS) and the Polish Filmmakers Association (Stowarzyszenie Filmowców Polskich &#8211; SFP), were involved in actions deemed as infringement of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/02/20/7809/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal interest, case IV CSK 665/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/07/6899/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/07/6899/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 PSEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 15 PSEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 448 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-evidences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Providing Services by Electronic Means]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudonym]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surname]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Writing under a pseudonym, Dariusz B. posted a comment on the website &#8220;Gazeta online Elbląg 24&#8243;. In his post Dariusz B. wrote to the Mayor of the Elbląg town, that he has photographs of people who sit in the city council, and he described the content of these pictures as a &#8220;sex scandal&#8221;. He noted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/07/6899/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
