<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Polish Supreme Administrative Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-courts/polish-supreme-administrative-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case II GSK 839/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/01/17/7463/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/01/17/7463/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 154 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(2) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(6) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 170 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicinal product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark lapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nufarm Australia Limited, the owner of the trade mark DUAL SALT TECHNOLOGY R-164428 registered for goods in Class 5, requested the Polish Patent Office to decide on the lapse of the right of protection for DUAL IR-0534713 owned by Syngenta Participations AG. Earlier before, Syngenta opposed the registratin of the trade mark DUAL SALT TECHNOLOGY [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/01/17/7463/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case I OSK 678/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 17 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 54 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 58 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotation right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of the story described in &#8220;Copyright law, case II SAB/Łd 53/10&#8220;. The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 21 July 2011 case file I OSK 678/11 ruled that copyrighted works in the form of test questions, if they are used for the state exam, become official documents, and the unused [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access to public information, case I OSK 667/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/23/7092/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/23/7092/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 184 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3 § 2 pt 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 54 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mayor of the Polish town Rabka-Zdrój refused to disclose land-use planning maps. The request was filed according to the provisions of the Polish Act of 6 September 2001 on access to public information – API – (in Polish: Ustawa o dostępie do informacji publicznej) Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 112, item 1198, with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/23/7092/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I FSK 1215/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7004/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 19 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 43 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 8 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 9 September 2011 case file I FSK 1215/10 ruled that activities of the Polish Artists&#8217; Association, a collecting society which is responsible for collective management of artists&#8217; and performers&#8217; rights that is based on signing of licensing agreements with copyright users and collecting and distribution of royalties, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case II GSK 615/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/07/6992/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/07/6992/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[acquired distinctiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 130 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 22 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(1) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary meaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr Roman Oraczewski Oficyna Wydawnicza PRESS-MEDIA requested the Polish Patent Office to invalidate the right of protection for the trade mark &#8220;Sto Panoramicznych&#8221; R-102530 owned by TECHNOPOL Agencja Wydawnicza Spółka z o. o. and registered for goods in Class 16 such as magazines. The PPO invalidated this trade mark and ruled that this designation is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/07/6992/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

