<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Polish Supreme Administrative Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-courts/polish-supreme-administrative-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Access to public information, case I OSK 2026/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/23/8196/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/23/8196/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 17 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=8196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5 February 2011, Bogusław Kler, a Polish patent and trade mark attorney, requested Anna Korbela, the President of the Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys, to disclose information concerning, inter alia, copy of the audio recording of the National Convention of Patent Attorneys that was held in 2010. The President answered that this request should [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/23/8196/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access to public information, case I OSK 2265/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/11/8084/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/11/8084/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expropriation of copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=8084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Polish company requested the Ministry of the Interior and Administration (MIA), and Director of the Centre of Information of MIA, to disclose all legal opinions prepared by the Polish Information Processing Society that concerned IT systems created by the Ministry. The Director provided all the requested documents, however the Ministry only asked the Company [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/11/8084/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access to public information, case I OSK 1550/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/07/8068/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/07/8068/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 133 §1 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 141 §4 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 151 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 61 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=8068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 22 November 2010, Bogusław Kler, a Polish patent and trade mark attorney, requested the President of the Polish Patent Office to disclose public information concerning the word trade mark PRINCE POLO R-148617, in order to know, whether during the examination, the trade mark POLO R-69429, or other marks containing this word were taken into [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/07/8068/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case II GSK 1261/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/09/7861/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/09/7861/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(1)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(3) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 143 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 144 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 145 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 151 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 245 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letter of consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish Patent Office in its decision of 29 January 2010 case no. DT-581/08 refused to grant the right of protection for the word-figurative trade mark FILIPETTI MONTENERO SPUMANTE DEMI SEC DALLA TRADIZIONE ITALIANA Z-298140 that was applied for by Domain Menada Sp. z o.o. for goods in Class 33. The PPO decided that this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/09/7861/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Procedural law, case II GSK 1206/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/06/7863/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/06/7863/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 08:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 183 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 45 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 29 November 2011 case file II GSK 1206/10 held that the provisions of Article 45(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland provide that everyone should have the right to a fair and public hearing of his or her case, without undue delay, before a competent, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/06/7863/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

