<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 1(1) API</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-access-to-public-information/art-11-api/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Access to public information, case II SAB/Wa 295/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/18/7413/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/18/7413/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Association of Leaders of Local Civic Groups (SLLGO) requested the Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk to disclose the correspondence, including e-mails, of members of the Council of Ministers and their assistants, that concerned the revision of the Polish Act of 6 September 2001 on access to public information – API – (in Polish: Ustawa [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/18/7413/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case I OSK 678/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 17 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 54 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 58 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotation right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of the story described in &#8220;Copyright law, case II SAB/Łd 53/10&#8220;. The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 21 July 2011 case file I OSK 678/11 ruled that copyrighted works in the form of test questions, if they are used for the state exam, become official documents, and the unused [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-access to public information, case IV SAB/Gl 36/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/24/7013/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/24/7013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Gliwice in its judgment of 2 August 2011 case file II SAB/Wa 86/07, held that the request filed in the electronic form i.e via e-mail, is a sufficient request for disclosure of public information. The Court repeated the rule that the request for disclosure of public information can take any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/24/7013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case I OSK 1975/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/13/6739/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/13/6739/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 2 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minister of Infrastructure did not respond to the request of a Polish company for disclosure of public information in the form of directory of multiple choice questions for the initial qualification tests for categories C1, C1 + E, C, C + E of driving license. The company filed a complaint of failure to act. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/13/6739/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case II SAB/Łd 53/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/11/6730/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/11/6730/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-autorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Łódź in its judgment of 20 December 2010 case file II SAB/Łd 53/10 ruled that the fact that different authors create questions from different fields of medicine for the National Specialist Examination, and these questions are copyrightable works within the meaning of the Article 1(1) of the Polish Act on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/11/6730/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

