<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 1 ARNR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-authors-rights-and-neighbouring-rights/art-1-arnr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Access to public information, case I OSK 2265/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/11/8084/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/11/8084/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expropriation of copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=8084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Polish company requested the Ministry of the Interior and Administration (MIA), and Director of the Centre of Information of MIA, to disclose all legal opinions prepared by the Polish Information Processing Society that concerned IT systems created by the Ministry. The Director provided all the requested documents, however the Ministry only asked the Company [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/05/11/8084/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case III CSK 30/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/03/14/7586/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/03/14/7586/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 8(3) ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informational claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Helena Miazek is a well known Polish folk artist and creator of paper cuts that are based on the long tradition of Łowicz region. Wawel S.A. is a Polish manufacturer of sweets. The company used different graphics with folk elements on its products. Helena Miazek and Stowarzyszenie Twórców Ludowych in Lublin (The Folk Artists Association [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/03/14/7586/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case I OSK 678/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 17 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 54 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 58 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotation right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of the story described in &#8220;Copyright law, case II SAB/Łd 53/10&#8220;. The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 21 July 2011 case file I OSK 678/11 ruled that copyrighted works in the form of test questions, if they are used for the state exam, become official documents, and the unused [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case I OSK 1975/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/13/6739/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/13/6739/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 2 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minister of Infrastructure did not respond to the request of a Polish company for disclosure of public information in the form of directory of multiple choice questions for the initial qualification tests for categories C1, C1 + E, C, C + E of driving license. The company filed a complaint of failure to act. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/13/6739/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case II SAB/Łd 53/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/11/6730/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/11/6730/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-autorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Łódź in its judgment of 20 December 2010 case file II SAB/Łd 53/10 ruled that the fact that different authors create questions from different fields of medicine for the National Specialist Examination, and these questions are copyrightable works within the meaning of the Article 1(1) of the Polish Act on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/11/6730/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

