<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law &#187; Art. 1 ARNR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-authors-rights-and-neighbouring-rights/art-1-arnr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case III SA/Wa 1823/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/17/3866/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/17/3866/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 19:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Director of Tax Control Office in Warsaw ruled that the amounts of cash referred to as a &#8220;license to exercise the media rights&#8221; that were received by Legia football club from the Polish Football Association (PZPN), should be subject to tax on goods and services. Legia argued that such an agreement is not a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/17/3866/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case II FSK 1182/08 &#8211; computer software is not literary work</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/04/1893/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/04/1893/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 21(1) LPIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 26(1) LPIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Legal Persons Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Polish company was purchasing rights to use of computer software from companies established in Ireland. The company has paid royalties to non-resident as defined in article 3 of the Polish Act of 15 February 1992 on legal persons’ income tax – LPIT (in Polish: Ustawa o podatku dochodowym od osób prawnych), consolidated text published [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/04/1893/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plagiarist pays</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/12/11/1290/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/12/11/1290/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magdalena Gad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 79 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the recent article published by Polish newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza, entitled &#8220;Kurpisz ma wyrok za plagiat. I to z błędem!&#8220;, Kurpisz &#8211; Polish Publishing House from Poznan has been found guilty of plagiarism and has to pay PLN 148,000 as well as apologize to the journalist whose copyrights it infringed. Kurpisz was accused of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/12/11/1290/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case I C 238/06</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/15/782/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/15/782/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magdalena Gad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Such a conclusion stems from the sentence of the District Court in Tarnow of 20 December 2007 in re: Bochnia Independence Half-Marathon, case file I C 238/06. Once upon a time&#8230; in the town of Bochnia, the so-called annual &#8220;Bochnia Independence Half-Marathon&#8221; used to take place. The event had been organized by the town and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/15/782/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does the Court cite?</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/03/772/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/03/772/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland in a judgment of 27 February 2009, case file V CSK 337/08, said that as a subject of copyright law have been considered (&#8230;) train timetables, cookbooks, patterns and forms. The Court quoted the judgement of the Supreme Court of 8 November 1932, Zb OSN 1933, poz.7. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/03/772/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
