<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-authors-rights-and-neighbouring-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case III CZP 61/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/19/7279/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/19/7279/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20(1) ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permissible use of copyrighted materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish Supreme Court in its order of 26 October 2011 case file III CZP 61/11 held that manufacturers and importers of photocopiers, scanners and other similar reprographic equipment, that allow for the production of copies of the whole or part of the published copyrighted work, are obliged to provide to the competent organization for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/19/7279/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case I OSK 678/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 17 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 54 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 58 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotation right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of the story described in &#8220;Copyright law, case II SAB/Łd 53/10&#8220;. The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 21 July 2011 case file I OSK 678/11 ruled that copyrighted works in the form of test questions, if they are used for the state exam, become official documents, and the unused [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case VI ACa 461/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/7146/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/7146/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 2 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 29 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 79 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derivative work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permissible use of copyrighted materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotation right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maryla Rodowicz is a well-known singer in Poland. She composed and recorded a song entitled &#8220;Marusia&#8221; about a Russian soldier-girl that was one of heroines from the book &#8220;Czterej pancerni i pies&#8221; written by Janusz Przymanowski. Mrs Rodowicz also created a video clip for this song. You can easily search and find it on YouTube. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/7146/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case P 18/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/14/7071/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/14/7071/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20(1) ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 31 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Constitutional Tribunal of the Republic of Poland in its judgment of 11 October 2011 case file P 18/09 held that Collecting Societies acting on behalf of authors, performers, producers of phonograms and videograms and publishers, may demand from manufacturers of copiers and recorders all information and documents necessary for calculation of the amount of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/14/7071/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case II SA/Gd 529/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/10/7121/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/10/7121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 145 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 152 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 32² ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permissible use of copyrighted materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mayor of Gdańsk city was requested to disclose an architectural project of the building. The Mayor refused and explained that this request could not be executed because it concerns the copyrighted work. By issuing certified copies the Mayor creates new documents, that may be used in different situations. The applicant argued that he needs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/10/7121/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

