<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 13 CUC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-combating-unfair-competition/art-13-cuc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Unfair competition, case V CSK 162/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/14/6264/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/14/6264/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 13 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knock-offs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look-alikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic copying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavish imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in its judgment of 14 October 2008 case file V CSK 162/08 interpreted the provisions of Article 13 of the Polish Act of 16 April 1993 on Combating Unfair Competition – CUC – (in Polish: ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji), Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 47, item 211, with subsequent amendments. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/14/6264/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfair competition law, case I CKN 1319/00</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/07/6762/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/07/6762/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 13 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knock-offs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look-alikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic copying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavish imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unnamed delict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lego system A/S, Lego Trading A/S, Kirkbi A/S from Denmark and Lego Polska spólka z o.o. sued Polish companies &#8220;COBERT&#8221; spólka z o.o. and &#8220;COBI&#8221; for unfair competition (the delict of imitating a product) based on regulations included in article 13 of the Polish Act of 16 April 1993 on Combating Unfair Competition – CUC [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/07/6762/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfair competition, case I ACa 900/99</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/09/11/3744/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/09/11/3744/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 13 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knock-offs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look-alikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic copying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavish imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Appellate Court in Katowice in its judgment of 29 March 2000 case file I ACa 900/99, interpreted provisions of article 13 of the Polish Act of 16 April 1993 on Combating Unfair Competition – CUC – (in Polish: ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji), Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 47, item 211, with later [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/09/11/3744/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Database protection, case II CK 174/02</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/17/3740/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/17/3740/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 13 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[database protection law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Protection of Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in its judgment of 7 January 2004 case file II CK 174/02 held that the acquisition of an electronic database and selling it to customers under a different name is deemed as an act of unfair competition, as defined in Articles 3 and 13 of the Polish Act of 16 April 1993 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/17/3740/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfair competition, case I ACa 147/99</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/10/3775/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/10/3775/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 13 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knock-offs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look-alikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic copying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavish imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Appellate Court in Lublin in a judgment of 27 May 1999, case file I ACa 147/99 ruled that the term &#8220;competitive activity&#8221; shall mean all actions taken in connection with participation in the market gambling, consisting in achieving maximum benefit from the sale of goods. The court also clarified the provisions of Article 13 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/10/3775/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

