<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 102 IPL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-industrial-property-law/art-102-ipl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 736/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/19/6425/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/19/6425/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 246 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 255 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual character of a design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty of an industrial design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 4 October 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 736/10 ruled that the protection of unregistered Community design that results from the Community regulations does not allow for its extension through the registration of that design. Moreover, the protection of an unregistered Community design starts from the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/19/6425/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 922/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/19/6422/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/19/6422/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informed user]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 13 September 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 922/10 ruled on three important factors of the design law. The VAC held that the &#8220;overall impression&#8221; refers to the design as a whole, and not to its individual characteristics. It is therefore a general effect, the general [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/19/6422/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case II GSK 932/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/10/6363/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/10/6363/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[appearance of the whole or a part of a product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103(3)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 108 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 117 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual character of a design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 19 October 2010 case file II GSK 932/09 held that an industrial design concerns the form of a product, i.e. external characteristics that are observable, and individual appearances of a product cannot be claimed only because the material which was used to achieve the final effect (that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/10/6363/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 921/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/12/06/6240/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/12/06/6240/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informed user]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 13 September 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 921/10 ruled on three important factors of the design law. The VAC held that the &#8220;overall impression&#8221; refers to the design as a whole, and not to its individual characteristics. It is therefore a general effect, the general [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/12/06/6240/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Industrial design law, case VI SA/Wa 852/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/23/6161/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/23/6161/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 102 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 103 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 104 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 117 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual character of a design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informed user]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 20 September 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 852/10 held that an industrial design has individual character if the overall impression it produces on the informed user differs from the overall impression caused by the design that was publicly available before the date according to which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/23/6161/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

