<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 132(2)(iii) IPL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-industrial-property-law/art-1322iii-ipl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 334/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/13/7380/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/13/7380/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D trade mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputed trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julius Sämann Ltd., the owner of the figurative trade mark WUNDERBAUM IR-0579396, filed a notice of opposition to a final decision of the Polish Patent Office on the grant of a right of protection for the word-figurative trade mark Forest Fresh R-183901 owned by S&#038;S Smiczek &#038; Smiczek Hanna Smiczek. Both trade marks were registered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/13/7380/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 211/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/06/7043/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/06/7043/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4(5) Directive 89/104]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 89/104/EEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letter of consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputed trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SOREMARTEC S.A. requested the Polish Patent Office to invalidate the right of protection for the trade mark Raffaello Spumante Dolce Sweet Spumante QUALITA SOPERIORE R-182895 registered for Toruńskie Piwnice Win VINPOL Sp. z o.o., currently VINPOL Sp. z o. o. SOREMARTEC claimed that this sign is similar to the renowned series of RAFFAELLO trade marks [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/06/7043/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I SA/Po 210/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/26/7328/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/26/7328/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 120(1) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(1)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(1)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(2)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(3) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(4) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(1)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(1)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(3) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(4) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 145 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 153 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16(1) LEIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6(1) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Legal Persons Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark depreciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Poznań in its judgment of 28 Jue 2011 case file I SA/Po 210/11 held that a subsidiary company is allowed to depreciate trade marks that were transferred to it as an apportionment, starting from the first day of a month, after one month the Polish Patent Office has granted the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/26/7328/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case case Sp. 181/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/24/6977/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/24/6977/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputed trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[well known trade marks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Adjudicative Board of the Polish Patent Office in its decision of 15 September 2010 case Sp. 181/09 invalidated the right of protection for the word-figurative trade mark LEXUS R-194634 registered for the Polish company Astin sp. z o.o. This trade mark was registered for goods and services in Classes 06, 19, 20 and 37. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/24/6977/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 112/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/07/6842/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/07/6842/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(2)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 145 §1 pt 4 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 166 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sfinks Polska S.A. from Łódź requested the Polish Patent Office to invalidate the rights of protection for word-figurative trade marks CLEOPATRA R-153234 and R-179260 owned by Restauracja CLEOPATRA Bachar Aziz from Lublin. Sfinks Polska is the owner of the earlier registered word-figurative trade mark SPHINX R-105162. Sfinks claimed that the trade mark CLEOPATRA R-153234 is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/07/6842/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

