<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 246 IPL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-industrial-property-law/art-246-ipl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 1236/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/06/7373/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/06/7373/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 164 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 246 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LEK, tovarna farmacevtskih in kemicnih izdelkov filed a notice of opposition to a final decision of the Polish Patent Office on the grant of a right of protection for the word trade mark KETOGEL R-190416 registered for Polpharma S.A. for goods such as pharmaceuticals. LEK argued that KETOGEL is similar to its word trade mark [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/06/7373/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 396/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/08/7160/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/08/7160/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[absolute grounds for refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 129(2)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 129(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(1)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 246 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[descriptive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geographical name as trade mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EAST SEA POLAND Spółka z o.o. filed a notice of opposition to a final decision of the Polish Patent Office on the grant of a right of protection for the word-figurative trade mark BIEN DÔNG R-204010 registered for services in Classes 36, 39 and 43, and owned by AEROCENTER TRAVEL Trinh Huy Ha. EAST SEA [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/08/7160/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 1901/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/15/6904/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/15/6904/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §3 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 246 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 77 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish Patent Office invalidated the right of protection for the word-figurative trade mark VILLA PARK WESOŁA R-171029 owned by &#8220;VILLA PARK WESOŁA&#8221; Spółka z o.o. The request was filed by MPM PRODUCT Spółka z o.o. the owner of the word trade mark &#8220;villa park&#8221; R-139436 that was registered with an earlier priority. MPM filed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/15/6904/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 2623/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/15/6748/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/15/6748/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 246 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 77 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in its judgment of 20 April 2011 case file VI SA/Wa 2623/10 ruled that, during proceedings for invalidation of the right of protection for trade mark, the applicant should be required to participate actively in evidence proceedings. It should be also noted that in the literature and the case-law on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/06/15/6748/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 2180/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/04/19/6615/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/04/19/6615/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[absolute grounds for refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §3 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 165 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 246 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 255 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 315 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(1) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 8 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 8(1) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[descriptive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 11 March 2011 case file VI SA/Wa 2180/10 ruled that the word-figurative trade mark 60 R-156991 is not sufficiently distinctive in standard business transactions because it does not individualize the goods of the trade mark owner among the goods of the same type that originate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/04/19/6615/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

