<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 296(2)(ii) IPL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-industrial-property-law/art-2962ii-ipl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case I ACa 1087/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/02/6540/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/02/6540/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1206 CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 154 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(1) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 89/104/EEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation 40/94]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Conciliation for Internet Domains at the Polish Chamber of Information Technology and Telecommunications (the CCID) in its award of 9 March 2010 case file 74/09/PA dismissed the complaint brought by Italian company Bisazza against Polish entrepreneur Rafał Kacprzak Installation.pl from Wrocław who registered the following domain names: bisazza.pl, bisazza.com.pl and bisazza-installation.com. Bisazza [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/02/6540/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case I ACa 1334/07</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/17/4091/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/17/4091/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 15(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 153 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 156 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The District Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 29 August 2007, case file XVI GC 756/06 dismissed the complaint filed by &#8220;Euro–net&#8221; sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the Court of Conciliation for Internet Domains at the Polish Chamber of Information Technology and Telecommunications of 23 March 2006, case file 22/05/PA PDF file, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/17/4091/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case V CSK 71/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/11/3292/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/11/3292/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 120(2) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 18 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(1) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputed trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[well known trade marks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technopol Publishing Agency filed a suit against Phoenix Press and Bauer Publishing House. Technopol requested the court to prohibit both defendants from putting on the market all magazines and periodicals bearing the number &#8220;100&#8243; or its multiples, and journals bearing the titles composed of three Arabic numerals together with the words &#8220;panorama&#8221; (in Polish: panorama) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/11/3292/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case IV CSK 61/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/16/790/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/16/790/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magdalena Gad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single colour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Combination of colors can be a protected trademark in Poland. Such a conclusion stems from the Supreme Court’s (SC) judgment of June 3, 2009, case file IV CSK 61/09. Pursuant to the SC, a combination of colors can be protected as a trademark, and shall not be deemed an attempt to monopolize the colors themselves. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/06/16/790/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case V CSK 109/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/04/24/7527/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/04/24/7527/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputed trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single colour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VKR Holding A/S from Horsholm sued Polish company OKPOL for trade mark infrigement and the delict of unfair competition. The suit was based on article 296(2)(iii) of the Polish Act of 30 June 2000 on Industrial Property Law – IPL – (in Polish: ustawa Prawo własności przemysłowej) of 30 June 2000, published in Dziennik Ustaw [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/04/24/7527/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

