<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 4 APAT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-patent-attorneys/art-4-apat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polish patent attorneys, case III CSK 337/07</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/10/29/631/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/10/29/631/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 2 APAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 APAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish Supreme Court in a judgment of 16 October 2004, case file CK III 580/03, published in the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, the Civil Chamber (in Polish: Orzecznictwo Sądu Najwyższego Izba Cywilna) of 2005/9/164/109, recognized the scope of representation for matters relating to unfair competition quite narrowly with regard to Polish patent attorneys&#8217; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/10/29/631/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polish patent attorneys, case II GSK 234/06</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/02/25/2426/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/02/25/2426/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 2 APAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 APAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 72 APAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kulikowska &#038; Kulikowski is a firm of patent attorneys (in Polish: kancelaria rzecznikow patentowych), constituted as a registered partnership. In the Polish legal system, there is no distinction between trade mark attorneys and patent attorneys: the legal profession, which deals with industrial property law, performs both those functions. The profession is regulated by the Act [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/02/25/2426/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polish patent attorneys, case CK III 580/03</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/02/24/2402/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/02/24/2402/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 2 APAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 APAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the basis of article 4, section 1, of the Polish Act on Patent Attorneys &#8211; APAT &#8211; (in Polish: ustawa o rzecznikach patentowych) of 11 April 2001, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 49, item 509, with subsequent amendments, a patent attorney profession is to provide assistance in matters of industrial property: to private [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/02/24/2402/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

