<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Polish Act on Patent Attorneys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-patent-attorneys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polish patent attorneys &#8211; amendments to the law</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/26/6458/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/26/6458/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 26 January 2011, the Act of 24 September 2010 amending the Polish Act on Patent Attorneys, published in Journal of Laws No. 197, item 1308, came into force. According to recent changes Polish patent attorneys may now represent clients in matters related to combating unfair competition. Patent attorney whose practice is based on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/26/6458/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polish patent attorneys, case I CSK 481/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/25/4217/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/25/4217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in its judgment of 16 June 2010, case file I CSK 481/09 held, that a party to the proceedings may request from its legal representative to compensate for damages only if the representative did not act diligent and failed to meet the prevailing standard of competence in his or her work on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/25/4217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polish patent attorneys &#8211; authentication of documents</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/25/4081/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/25/4081/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 76a APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 9 APAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to articles 76a § 2, 3 and 4 of the Administrative Proceedings Code – APC – (in Polish: Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego) of 14 June 1960, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 30, item 168, consolidated text of 9 October 2000, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 98, item 1071 with subsequent amendments, a party [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/25/4081/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Administrative, civil and criminal proceedings in trade mark cases in Poland</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/12/22/1356/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/12/22/1356/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Criminal Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I. The Law The main sources of binding laws in the Republic of Poland are the Constitution of 2 April 1997, acts passed by the Parliament, ratified international treaties and regulations issued, for example, by the Prime Minister or the Council of Ministers &#8211; Polish government. Regulations are issued for the purpose of implementation of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/12/22/1356/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polish patent attorneys, case III CZP 118/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/29/4233/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/29/4233/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in its judgment of 23 January 2009, case file III CZP 118/08, held that an advocate, legal advisor or patent attorney who is acting as a substitute representative cannot authenticate a copy of the basic power of attorney that was issued in the name of the primary proxy. The court also ruled [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/29/4233/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

