<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 20 APL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-press-law/art-20-apl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case V CSK 293/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/02/5087/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/02/5087/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 746 §1 CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press title]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polish company Technopol sp. z o.o. succeeded to register in the Polish Patent Office over a hundred word and word-figurative trade marks in the form of Arabic numeral &#8220;100&#8243; and its multiples (200, 300, etc.) together with the word &#8220;Panoramicznych&#8221; or &#8220;Panoram&#8221;. Technopol was sued by another Polish entrepreneur, Roman Oraczewski who publishes crossword magazines [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/02/5087/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press law, case VII Ka 715/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/07/3239/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/07/3239/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 21 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 45 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Regional Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two partners of a civil partnership have been accused that in the period from 10 April 2002 to 4 June 2006, they have been acting jointly and in the agreement, and they have been publishing without the adequate and propert registration a periodical entitled &#8220;www.bielsko.biala.pl&#8221; that was available in the Internet, i.e., they were accused [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/03/07/3239/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press law, case VI Ka 409/07</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/14/2252/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/14/2252/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 PSEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 21 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 25(4) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 255 CRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 37a APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4(9) LOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 414 CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 45 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 49a APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 66 CRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2000/31/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2002/58/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Providing Services by Electronic Means]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Telecommunications Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Criminal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Criminal Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Regional Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facts and legal dispute A Polish TV channel, TVN, in its show entitled UWAGA broadcast footage that criticised the work of a debt collector, Wojciech D., who held office in a Pomeranian town of Bytów. Internauts were prompt to comment on his work. This boiled down mostly to offensive statements, some of which are provided [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/14/2252/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press law, case IV KK 174/07</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/03/31/362/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/03/31/362/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press title]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/03/31/362/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in its order of 27 July 2007, case file IV KK 0174/07, held that publishing news within Internet website which was available under szyciepoprzemysku.prv.pl domain name, is the deemed as equivalent to press publishing. They were charged by the Prosecutor for publishing the press without registration which was the breach of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/03/31/362/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press law, case I CKN 540/00</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/29/3709/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/29/3709/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 21 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press title]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in the order of 5 March 2002, case file I CKN 540/00 held that provisions of the Polish Act of 16 April 1993 on Combating Unfair Competition – CUC – (in Polish: ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji), Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 47, item 211, with later amendments, shall not apply [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/08/29/3709/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

