<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law &#187; Art. 25(4) APL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-press-law/art-254-apl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polish Courts Say Websites Should Be Registered As Press</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/14/2252/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/14/2252/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 PSEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 21 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 25(4) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 255 CRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 37a APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4(9) LOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 414 CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 45 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 49a APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 66 CRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2000/31/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2002/58/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Providing Services by Electronic Means]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Telecommunications Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appellate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Criminal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Criminal Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Regional Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computers networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article was originally published in the Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, C.T.L.R. 2009, 15(1), 9-14. Facts and legal dispute A Polish TV channel, TVN, in its show entitled UWAGA broadcast footage that criticised the work of a debt collector, Wojciech D., who held office in a Pomeranian town of Bytów. Internauts were prompt to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/14/2252/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press law, case V CK 675/03</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/02/25/4611/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/02/25/4611/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 25(4) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 42(2) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court &#8211; Civil Chamber in its judgement of 15 July 2004 case file V CK 675/03 held that the publisher is required to control the content of advertisings that were posted in its magazine only in terms of their compliance with laws and principles of social coexistence. For the remaining contents the responsible [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/02/25/4611/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
