<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 25(4) APL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-press-law/art-254-apl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Press law, case VI Ka 409/07</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/14/2252/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/14/2252/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 PSEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 21 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 25(4) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 255 CRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 37a APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4(9) LOB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 414 CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 45 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 49a APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 66 CRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2000/31/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2002/58/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Providing Services by Electronic Means]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Telecommunications Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Criminal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Criminal Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Regional Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facts and legal dispute A Polish TV channel, TVN, in its show entitled UWAGA broadcast footage that criticised the work of a debt collector, Wojciech D., who held office in a Pomeranian town of Bytów. Internauts were prompt to comment on his work. This boiled down mostly to offensive statements, some of which are provided [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/01/14/2252/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press law, case V CK 675/03</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/02/25/4611/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/02/25/4611/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 25(4) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 42(2) APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court &#8211; Civil Chamber in its judgement of 15 July 2004 case file V CK 675/03 held that the publisher is required to control the content of advertisings that were posted in its magazine only in terms of their compliance with laws and principles of social coexistence. For the remaining contents the responsible [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2005/02/25/4611/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

