<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-proceedings-before-administrative-courts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 1319/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/28/7296/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/28/7296/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §3 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(1)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 134 §1 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 151 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 245 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 77 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CC TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 89/104/EEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Designer drugs are well-known as &#8220;dopalacze&#8221; in Poland (in English: boosters). They were freely available on the Polish market because of the legal loophole in the Polish Act of 29 July 2005 on Counteracting Drug Addiction. In 2010, after different mainstream media reported on several cases involving health problems caused by such drugs, the Polish [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/28/7296/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 1291/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/23/7285/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/23/7285/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[absolute grounds for refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquired distinctiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 129(1)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 129(2)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 129(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 151 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[descriptive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish Patent Office refused to grant the right of protection for the word-figurative trade mark LAW24.pl applied for the Polish law firm Komarnicka Korpalski Kancelaria Prawna sp.j for services in Class 35 such as advising on business and business management consultancy, in Class 36 such as financial consultancy and financial and accounting activity, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/23/7285/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case I OSK 678/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 17 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 54 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 58 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(1) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotation right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of the story described in &#8220;Copyright law, case II SAB/Łd 53/10&#8220;. The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 21 July 2011 case file I OSK 678/11 ruled that copyrighted works in the form of test questions, if they are used for the state exam, become official documents, and the unused [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/11/03/6982/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 875/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/27/7106/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/27/7106/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §3 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 145 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 152 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 164 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 77 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 80 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Juliusz Marek Nabiałek who owns the word-figurative trade mark Platan R-210901, filed a request for invalidation of the word-figurative trade mark PLATANUS OGRODY NATURALNE R-210602 registered for Przemysław Sochański. Mr. Nabiałek claimed that both signs are similar and cause the risk of misleading the public as to the origin of goods and services, especially since [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/27/7106/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Access to public information, case I OSK 667/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/23/7092/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/23/7092/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 14 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 184 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3 § 2 pt 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 54 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on access to public information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mayor of the Polish town Rabka-Zdrój refused to disclose land-use planning maps. The request was filed according to the provisions of the Polish Act of 6 September 2001 on access to public information – API – (in Polish: Ustawa o dostępie do informacji publicznej) Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 112, item 1198, with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/23/7092/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

