<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Polish Act on Telecommunications Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-telecommunications-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Personal interest, case II C 626/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/27/8062/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/27/8062/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Convention on Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Telecommunications Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunication law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=8062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2007, for about 6 months, the Polish Central Anti-corruption Bureau collected telecommunications data, including billings and location data from BTS, of a Polish journalist Bogdan Wróblewski. Mr Wróblewski sued the Polish State Treasury which according to the Polish law represents the Polish state in certain legal aspects.. The District Court in Warsaw in its [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/27/8062/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal interest, case II SA/Wa 364/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/13/7061/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/13/7061/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 159 TLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspector General for Personal Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Telecommunications Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surname]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunication law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 2010, entries signed by the nick &#8220;arfulik&#8221; appeared on few Polish websites, the author wrote critically about the company Bavaria Consulting and a person who is a member of the board. It seemed that this unknown author conducted a competitive activity. Bavaria and Krystiana D. decided to sue for the infringement of personal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/13/7061/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telecommunication law, case XVII AmA 62/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/27/7276/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/27/7276/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 00:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Telecommunications Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection in its decision of 20 December 2007 No. DOK-98/2007 decided that the market practice of Telekomunikacja Polska S.A. based on discriminatory lowering of IP traffic, by actions that lead to a reduction of the quality or the disabling of data transfer, is the practice of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/27/7276/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telecommunications law, case I OSK 1079/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/03/4860/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/03/4860/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 159 TLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 160 TLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 161 TLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 PPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 PPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 61 §3 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Protection of Personal Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Telecommunications Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of a story described in &#8220;Personal data protection, case II SA/Wa 1598/09&#8220;. The Supreme Administrative Court in its order of 15 July 2010 case file I OSK 1079/10 decided to stay the execution of the decision issued by the Inspector General for Personal Data Protection (GIODO) and ruled that the Polish [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/08/03/4860/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case I ACa 272/06</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 140 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Telecommunications Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Appellate Court in Katowice, in a judgment of 16 June 2006, case file I ACa 272/06, ruled that it is pointless to talk about the &#8220;ownership&#8221; of Internet domains, because the civil law sets the property rights in article 140 of the Civil Code, which only refers to tangibles, and domains are not such [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

