<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 25 TMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-trade-marks/art-25-tma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Procedural law, case GSK 940/04</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/25/6580/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/25/6580/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 135 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 25 TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark lapse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 7 January 2005 case file GSK 940/04 held that the SAC shall apply the measures provided for in Article 135 the Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts &#8211; PBAC &#8211; (in Polish: Prawo o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi of 30 August 2002), published in Journal Of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/25/6580/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case II GSK 668/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/28/7506/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/28/7506/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 105 §1 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(1)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 133 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 153 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 168 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 170 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 172 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 25 TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 256 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 30 TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark lapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 25 January 2005, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. applied to register the word trade mark CHOKELLA, Z-290315 in class 30, for goods such as: breakfast cereals, muesli, corn flakes, cereal bars, cereal flakes, cereal preparations, food products based on rice, flour or cereals, also in the form of ready-to-use meals. Being aware that it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/28/7506/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, VI SA/Wa 1962/07</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/07/06/4287/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/07/06/4287/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(2) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(6) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 25 TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 30 TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 315 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genuine use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark lapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish company Zakład Gospodarki Komunalnej Organizacja Odzysku Biosystem S.A. requested the Polish Patent Office to take a decision on the lapse of the right of protection for IR-653449 and IR-585713 trade marks registered for goods in the following classes 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 16, 20, 21, 24, 25, 29, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/07/06/4287/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case II GSK 252/06</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/06/30/4255/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/06/30/4255/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(2) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 25 TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 28(1) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genuine use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark lapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imperial Tobacco Limited from the UK requested the Polish Patent Office (PPO) to decide in litigation procedure on the lapse of a right of protection for MOON R-91725 trade mark owned by Polish company Altadis Polska S.A. The British company based its legal interest on the fact the it has applied for recognition on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/06/30/4255/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

