<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Polish Civil Proceedings Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-civil-proceedings-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case I ACa 1087/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/02/6540/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/02/6540/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 1206 CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 154 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(1) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 5 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 89/104/EEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation 40/94]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court of Conciliation for Internet Domains at the Polish Chamber of Information Technology and Telecommunications (the CCID) in its award of 9 March 2010 case file 74/09/PA dismissed the complaint brought by Italian company Bisazza against Polish entrepreneur Rafał Kacprzak Installation.pl from Wrocław who registered the following domain names: bisazza.pl, bisazza.com.pl and bisazza-installation.com. Bisazza [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/02/6540/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case IV CSK 359/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/17/5354/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/17/5354/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 1 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 17 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 365 CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 79 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyrightable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threshold of creativity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish company KREA sp. z o.o. prepared a label design for yoghurt packaging that was commissioned by Wojciech Jurkiewicz. The Company contacted a freelance graphic deisgner to create word-figurative trade mark, which was to be placed on this packaging. KREA acquired all copyrights. Wojciech Jurkiewicz filed for trade mark registration but the PPO refused [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/17/5354/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case V CSK 293/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/02/5087/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/02/5087/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 10 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 APL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 746 §1 CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal rights or interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press title]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polish company Technopol sp. z o.o. succeeded to register in the Polish Patent Office over a hundred word and word-figurative trade marks in the form of Arabic numeral &#8220;100&#8243; and its multiples (200, 300, etc.) together with the word &#8220;Panoramicznych&#8221; or &#8220;Panoram&#8221;. Technopol was sued by another Polish entrepreneur, Roman Oraczewski who publishes crossword magazines [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/09/02/5087/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case II GSK 425/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/07/3771/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/07/3771/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 19:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 131(2)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 16(1) TRIPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 234 CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6septies Paris Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 8 Paris Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 30 August 2004, the Polish Patent Office registered word-figurative trade mark Ravago R-154724 to Walter Breitengraser. The Polish company RESINEX Sp. z.o.o. submitted a request for invalidation of the right of protection, arguing that Mr Breitengraser has applied for the registration in violation of RESINEX personal and economic rights arising from the rights to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/07/3771/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Procedural law, case V CSK 269/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/11/6606/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/11/6606/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 228 §1 CPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-evidences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in its judgment of 10 February 2010 case file V CSK 269/09 held that publishing information on the Internet about the specific fact does not mean that it is widely known fact as defined in Article 228 § 1 of the Civil Proceedings Code – CPC (in Polish: Kodeks Postępowania Cywilnego) of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/04/11/6606/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

