<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Art. 292 CRC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-criminal-code/art-292-crc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case I KZP 8/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/07/01/1414/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/07/01/1414/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 291 CRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 292 CRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 305(1) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Criminal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Regional Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=1414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish Supreme Court (SC), the Criminal Law Chamber sitting in extended bench of seven Justices, in a jugment of 30 June 2008, case file I KZP 8/08, answered the question whether the Polish legislator&#8217;s intent was to leave acts of purchasing counterfeit goods with impunity or should such deeds be deemed as fencing according [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/07/01/1414/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

