<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; Polish patent attorneys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-patent-attorneys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polish patent attorneys &#8211; amendments to the law</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/26/6458/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/26/6458/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 26 January 2011, the Act of 24 September 2010 amending the Polish Act on Patent Attorneys, published in Journal of Laws No. 197, item 1308, came into force. According to recent changes Polish patent attorneys may now represent clients in matters related to combating unfair competition. Patent attorney whose practice is based on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/01/26/6458/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 503/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/20/4673/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/20/4673/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In January 2010, Polish company LMW sp z o.o. represented by a patent attorney filed via the Polish Patent Office (PPO) a complaint to the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw, against the decision of the PPO on the refusal to grant a right of protection for LIBERTY MOTORS trade mark Z-315048. In the Court’s order [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/20/4673/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polish patent attorneys, case II GZ 224/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/28/4224/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/28/4224/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 178 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 194 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 197 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 18 May 2010, case file II GZ 224/09 ruled that the Act on the Law on proceedings before administrative courts – PBAC – (in Polish: Prawo o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi) of 30 August 2002, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 153, item 1270, with later amendments, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/28/4224/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polish patent attorneys, case I CSK 481/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/25/4217/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/25/4217/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in its judgment of 16 June 2010, case file I CSK 481/09 held, that a party to the proceedings may request from its legal representative to compensate for damages only if the representative did not act diligent and failed to meet the prevailing standard of competence in his or her work on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/06/25/4217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polish patent attorneys, case I OZ 356/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/30/4133/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/30/4133/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 17:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish patent attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 17 May 2010 case file I OZ 356/10, held that if legal representative refuses to prepare and file an appeal because he or she believes that such appeal would be unfounded, and informs the party, giving a proper opinion in this matter, this must be regarded as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/30/4133/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

