<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; tax law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/tax-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I SA/Ol 270/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/6962/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/6962/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 10(1) PITA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Personal Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Director of a Tax office decided that a person who led undeclared but taxable economic activity is subject to VAT. This decision was based on the basis of bank statements and information provided by the auction website Allegro. The amount of the tax obligation was set out in the amount of tax due, without [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/6962/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I SA/Łd 762/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7294/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7294/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 145 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 151 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal regulations on computer networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Łódź in its judgment of 23 September 2010 case file I SA/Łd 762/10 held that a person whose account on an auction website was illegally hacked and used for sale of goods by someone else, is not obliged account to tax for such activity.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/09/24/7294/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I SA/Po 486/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/11/6478/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/11/6478/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Chamber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Poznań in its judgment of 22 October 2010 case file I SA/Po 486/10 held that a company that is required to send annual tax information about its employees, is also allowed to send to him or her a tax declaration in the form of electronic message (e-mail), under the condition [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/11/6478/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case I SA/Wr 1080/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/27/6304/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/27/6304/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 10:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 86 GSTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-law issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Wrocław in its judgment of 24 November 2010 case file I SA/Wr 1080/10 ruled that the client can deduct all the VAT in case of advance payment of fees for the entire period of software maintenance. The position of a tax authority stating that deduction is possible only in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/27/6304/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax law, case II FSK 1140/09</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/21/6276/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/21/6276/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax on copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the request, which was submitted to the tax authorities on 8 July 2008, a Polish company (the Company) explained that it buys the rights to movies, which are intended for sale to TV stations. The contract that is signed with a foreign company from which Polish Company buys rights for movies concerns several titles, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/11/21/6276/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

