<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; non-use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/trademark-law/non-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 1203/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/24/8008/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/24/8008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genuine use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark lapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=8008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VINEX PRESLAV from Bulgaria requested the Polish Patent Office to decide on the lapse of the right of protection for the trade mark MADARA R-97447 owned by Dimyat Polska Sp. z o.o. Earlier, VINEX PRESLAV applied to the PPO to recognise on the territory of the Republic of Poland of the protection for its international [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/04/24/8008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case II GSK 839/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/01/17/7463/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/01/17/7463/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 154 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(2) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(6) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 170 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicinal product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark lapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nufarm Australia Limited, the owner of the trade mark DUAL SALT TECHNOLOGY R-164428 registered for goods in Class 5, requested the Polish Patent Office to decide on the lapse of the right of protection for DUAL IR-0534713 owned by Syngenta Participations AG. Earlier before, Syngenta opposed the registratin of the trade mark DUAL SALT TECHNOLOGY [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2012/01/17/7463/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case IV CSK 393/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/05/7344/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/05/7344/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D trade mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquired distinctiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 120(1) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genuine use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputed trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark dilution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hochland Reich Summer &#038; Co. KG owns a three-dimensional trade mark IR-736770 in Poland, and Hochland AG is the owner of the right in registration of an industrial design Rp-5337. The 3D trade mark is not used in the clear registered form, but is marketed as a product package of ALMETTE cheese, with additional verbal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/05/7344/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case II GSK 269/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/05/6917/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/05/6917/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §1 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 134 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 255 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 256 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 315 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 6 TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 77 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homogenity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputed trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polish company Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcji Lodów &#8220;KORAL&#8221; Józef Koral Spółka jawna from Limanowa, the owner of the word trade mark RED BLUE Z-277694 requested the Polish Patent Office to decide on the invalidation of the right of protection for the word trade mark RED BULL IR-708694 in part for goods in Class 30. KORAL claimed inter [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/08/05/6917/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case II GSK 259/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/04/07/6596/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/04/07/6596/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 9(1)(i) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genuine use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark lapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mariusz Lech Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Uslugowe LECH-POL from Lask requested the Polish Patent Office to invalidate the right of protection for the word trade mark &#8220;lech wódka&#8221; R-145285 registered for Fabryka Wódek POLMOS ŁAŃCUT S.A. for goods in class 33 such as alcoholic beverages: vodka. Mariusz Lech argued that the questioned trade mark is confusingly similar to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/04/07/6596/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

