<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; product packaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/trademark-law/product-packaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 334/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/13/7380/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/13/7380/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D trade mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(ii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 132(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputed trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julius Sämann Ltd., the owner of the figurative trade mark WUNDERBAUM IR-0579396, filed a notice of opposition to a final decision of the Polish Patent Office on the grant of a right of protection for the word-figurative trade mark Forest Fresh R-183901 owned by S&#038;S Smiczek &#038; Smiczek Hanna Smiczek. Both trade marks were registered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/12/13/7380/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case IV CSK 393/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/05/7344/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/05/7344/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D trade mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquired distinctiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 120(1) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 296(2)(iii) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genuine use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputed trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark dilution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hochland Reich Summer &#038; Co. KG owns a three-dimensional trade mark IR-736770 in Poland, and Hochland AG is the owner of the right in registration of an industrial design Rp-5337. The 3D trade mark is not used in the clear registered form, but is marketed as a product package of ALMETTE cheese, with additional verbal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/10/05/7344/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 538/11</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/09/6858/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/09/6858/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D trade mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §1 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 145 PBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 156 §1 pt 7 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 98/71/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Administrative Proceedings Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark lapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the continuation of the story described in &#8220;Trade mark law, case Sp. 457/08&#8220;. Unilever filed a complaint against the decision of the Polish Patent Office in which the PPO decided on the lapse of the right or protection of 3D trade mark R-134678 because of its non-use in the form in which the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/07/09/6858/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case II GSK 206/06</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/04/25/7307/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/04/25/7307/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D trade mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 8(1) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 8(2) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 9(1)(i) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement of registered industrial design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invalidation of a right in registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Administrative Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=7307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 16 July 1996, the Polish Patent Office refused to grant the right of protection for the figurative trade mark DVORAK IR-639197. On 27 August 2003, the PPO upheld its decision and ruled that the sign in question is similar to two figurative trade marks R-79913 and R-80064 that were registered with an earlier priority [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/04/25/7307/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case Sp. 457/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/21/6500/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/21/6500/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D trade mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 169(1)(i) IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genuine use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark lapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish Patent Office invalidated the registration of the industrial design &#8220;bottle with cap&#8221; Rp-2543 owned by Zakład Produkcj Opakowań Rosiński i S-ka sp.j. The request for invalidation was filed by Unilever, which claimed that the design infringes on its 3D trade mark R-134678. This 3D trade mark has the form of a bottle for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2011/02/21/6500/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

