<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; look-alikes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/unfair-competition-law/unfair-competition-delict/look-alikes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 203/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/10/11/5706/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/10/11/5706/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 107 §3 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 164 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 22 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 315 IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 4 TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(1) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 7(2) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 77 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 8(1) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 80 APC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generic sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genuine use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knock-offs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look-alikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic copying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavish imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark invalidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=5706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Polish company INTERKOBO Sp. z o.o. filed a request for the invalidation of the right of protection for &#8220;kucyk pony&#8221; R-139097 trade mark registered for HASBRO POLAND Sp. z o.o. Kucyk means &#8220;pony&#8221; in Polish language. INTERKOBO argued that it has the legitimate interest in the invalidation proceedings because it is a manufacturer of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/10/11/5706/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfair competition, case I ACa 1270/10</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/11/3797/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/11/3797/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 20 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look-alikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=3797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Warsaw Court of Appeal in a judgment case file I ACa 1270/10, held that a failure to enforce one&#8217;s trademark protection can lead not only to the expiration of the protection right but even to an entire forfeiture of the right. The unfair competition dispute between the Croatian Podravka (and its Polish daughter company [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/05/11/3797/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case I CSK 96/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/20/4403/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/20/4403/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[famous trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judgments of Court of Justice of the EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knock-offs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look-alikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-traditional trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation 40/94]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavish imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[well known trade marks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=4403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the shade of the recent opinion of Advocate General Eleanor Sharpston QC given to the Court of Justice of the European Communities in case C‑529/07, Chocoladefabriken Lindt &#038; Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH, here is the story of couple of judgments decided in the recent suits brought against the Polish company Terravita by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/03/20/4403/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfair competition, case V CSK 162/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/14/6264/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/14/6264/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 13 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knock-offs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look-alikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic copying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavish imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court in its judgment of 14 October 2008 case file V CSK 162/08 interpreted the provisions of Article 13 of the Polish Act of 16 April 1993 on Combating Unfair Competition – CUC – (in Polish: ustawa o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji), Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 47, item 211, with subsequent amendments. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/14/6264/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfair competition law, case I CKN 1319/00</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/07/6762/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/07/6762/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 13 CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 3(1) CUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knock-offs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look-alikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic copying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Combating Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavish imitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition delict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unnamed delict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=6762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lego system A/S, Lego Trading A/S, Kirkbi A/S from Denmark and Lego Polska spólka z o.o. sued Polish companies &#8220;COBERT&#8221; spólka z o.o. and &#8220;COBI&#8221; for unfair competition (the delict of imitating a product) based on regulations included in article 13 of the Polish Act of 16 April 1993 on Combating Unfair Competition – CUC [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/12/07/6762/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

