<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Polish IP &#38; IT law - copyright trademark computer internet telecomm &#187; US law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/us-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rychlicki.net/en</link>
	<description>Tomasz Rychlicki Intellectual Property Law Internet Law IT Law Computer Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Internet domains, case I ACa 272/06</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 140 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet domains law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Telecommunications Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish TLDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=2005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Appellate Court in Katowice, in a judgment of 16 June 2006, case file I ACa 272/06, ruled that it is pointless to talk about the &#8220;ownership&#8221; of Internet domains, because the civil law sets the property rights in article 140 of the Civil Code, which only refers to tangibles, and domains are not such [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/02/08/2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent law, case VI SA/Wa 2566/08</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/13/861/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/13/861/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Industrial Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Patent Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 10 June 2009 case file VI SA/Wa 2566/08 held that it is up to the Polish Patent Office (PPO) to reconsider the matter in its entirety and refer to the statements and allegations contained in the request for the reconsideration of the case, taking into [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/10/13/861/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright law, case I ACr 590/95</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/09/12/527/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/09/12/527/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 75 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The No Electronic Theft Act (Pub. L. No. 105-147, 111 Stat. 2678 (Dec. 16, 1997)) introduced changes into 17 U.S.C § 101. Definitions. The term &#8220;financial gain&#8221; includes receipt, or expectation of receipt, of anything of value, including the receipt of other copyrighted works. In Poland, we have judgment of the Appellate Court in Warsaw [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/09/12/527/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal rights, case I ACa 385/2006</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/07/31/428/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/07/31/428/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 23 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 24 CC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 47 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 54 Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 81 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art. 83 ARNR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Convention on Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspector General for Personal Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Press Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Protection of Personal Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Appeallate Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Civil Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Criminal Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right of publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update on Februrary 27, 2010. I reported on a final judgment in Justyna Steczkowska&#8217;s case in my post entitled &#8220;Personal rights, case I ACa 1176/09&#8220;. My post that was written in Polish language is too long and probably boring for most of you. It concerns Justyna Steczkowska&#8217;s naked pictures taken during her holiday at Turkish [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/07/31/428/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 805/05</title>
		<link>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/06/03/400/</link>
		<comments>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/06/03/400/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Rychlicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art. 9(1)(i) TMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinctive character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish Act on Trade marks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polish law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity of signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voivodeship Administrative Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rychlicki.net/en/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Voivodeship Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 22 February 2006, case file VI SA/Wa 805/05 held that trade marks that are meant as signs for clothes (among other things for pants) resemble to each other to the extent that it may lead into the confusion of a consumer as regard to origin of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rychlicki.net/en/2008/06/03/400/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

